Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 741 - 746 of 746
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism
Report to HRC A/HRC/40/52/Add.5 from 24 May 2018 to 31 May 2018 8 May 2019 Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism Belgium United Nations A/HRC/40/52/Add.5 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/40/52/Add.5https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f40%2f52%2fAdd.5&Lang=en
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 2010 05 28 Strasbourg 18 January 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_SlovakRepublic_en
V. v. Denmark
V. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013 Communication number s : 57/2013 Author: V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3030/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
ZAJA v. Croatia
ZAJA v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The cases aja and Lopac concern violations of the applicants right not to be punished without law on account of their conviction of an administrative offence for importing goods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45943
ZAYIDOV v. Azerbaijan (no. 2)
ZAYIDOV v. Azerbaijan no. 2 AZE 24/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: The present case concerns destruction of the applicant s book manuscript by the detention facility administration. The Court found that the interference with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60703