Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7421 - 7440 of 7854
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Spence v. Jamaica
Spence v. Jamaica CCPR/C/57/D/599/1994 Communication number s : 599/1994 Author: Wayne Spence Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Jamaica Submission date 20 Oct 1994 Date of decision 18 Jul 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of the JUTBCCPR/C/57/D/599/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/514/en-US
Statement delivered by Vice-president Juan Esteban Aguirre Martínez on behalf of the President of the Human Rights Council at the 10th UPR Pre-Sessions organized by UPR Info
8 April 2015 Ladies and Gentlemen On behalf of the Presidency of the Human Rights Council let me welcome you all to the 10th UPR pre session. I am honored to be with you this morning and grateful to UPR Info for organizing these important and useful pre UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2015/04/statement-delivered-vice-president-juan-esteban-aguirre-martinez-behalf
Strakhov and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhov and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: S. Strakhova and Asad Fayzullaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Sep 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001&1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1405/en-US
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: Ms. S. Strakhova mother of Mr. Maxim Strakhov and Mr. Asad Fayzullaev on behalf of his son Nigmat Type of decision: Decision on JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001,1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3214/en-US
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/1992/2010 Communication number s : 1992/2010 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Apr 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 Comment: Right to be JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1992/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1914/en-US
Suils Ramonet v. Spain
Suils Ramonet v. Spain CCPR/C/97/D/1555/2007 Communication number s : 1555/2007 Author: Juan Suils Ramonet Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Spain Submission date 18 Sep 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1555/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1031/en-US
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security (ETS No. 078A)
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security ETS No. 078A 078A Paris 1972 12 14T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 78 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 078Ahttps://rm.coe.int/1680074619
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 14 to 18 June 2010
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT from 14 to 18 June 2010 ITA a 2011 04 14 2013 11 19 CPT/Inf 2013 CPTCPT/Inf (2013) 30 [Part 2]https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-ita-20100615-en
Surgan v. Belarus
Surgan v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010 Communication number s : 1969/2010 Author: Taras Surgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 28 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2011/en-US
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009 Communication number s : 1910/2009 Author: Svetlana Zhuk Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Oct 2009 Date of decision 30 Oct 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1689/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
T.C. v. Peru
T.C. v. Peru CAT/C/75/D/930/2019 Communication number s : 930/2019 Author: T.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Peru Submission date 31 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/75/D/930/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3738/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.T. v. Ukraine
T.T. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017 Communication number s : 2985/2017 Author: T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Apr 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3686/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
TASEVA PETROVSKA v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
TASEVA PETROVSKA v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 11/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing before the High Administrative Court due to the failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48715