Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 3944
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A. R. A. v. Sweden
A. R. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/38/D/305/2006 Communication number s : 305/2006 Author: A. R. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 38 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 30 Apr 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/38/D/305/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/100/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CRPD/C/25/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 25 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Dec 2019 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3065/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
ABENAVOLI v. Italy
ABENAVOLI v. Italy ITA 02/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The Abenavoli group of cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts since the 1990s violations of Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28186
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine UKR 10/10/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or controlled by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25317
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ADAMOVIC v. Serbia
ADAMOVIC v. Serbia SRB 18/03/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Non enforcement of a judgment awarding the applicant unpaid allowances from his former employer. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8645
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AKHUNDOV v. Azerbaijan
AKHUNDOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 03/05/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of a fair trial due to the non enforcement of final domestic decisions entailing various EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1725
ALAGIC v. Croatia
ALAGIC v. Croatia HRV 11/05/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12006
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect. Article 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55423
ALI RIZA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ALI RIZA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 22/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of Article 6 1 right to a fair hearing of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the lack of independence and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55551
ALI v. Romania
ALI v. Romania ROU 09/02/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 12:37:00 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Overcrowding and poor material conditions in prison and police detention facilities and other EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14169
ALIJA v. Greece
ALIJA v. Greece GRC 07/07/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to lack of sufficient reasoning in a domestic court decision rejecting the applicants requests for compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22310
ALISIC AND OTHERS v. Serbia
ALISIC AND OTHERS v. Serbia SRB 16/07/2014 00:00:00 07/10/2016 11:12:28 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to inability of the applicant a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina to recover old foreign currency savings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188