Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8501 - 8520 of 8546
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X. J. v. Netherlands
X. J. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008 Communication number s : 1840/2008 Author: X. J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1249/en-US
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 05/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to protect the life of a woman who was a victim of domestic violence had filed several complaints stating that she feared for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61103
Y.F. v. Panama
Y.F. v. Panama CRC/C/83/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 048/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Panama Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2630/en-US
Y.T. v. Bulgaria
Y.T. v. Bulgaria BGR 09/10/2020 00:00:00 03/11/2020 18:11:46 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified refusal of the District Court and Regional Court of Stara Zagora in 2015 and 2016 to grant the applicant who is a transsexual his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56173
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 NULL 2014 02 24T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/YEM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b989af21-e4c6-443b-9783-77884216cc8b