Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 201 - 220 of 13336
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to marry: Prohibition of marriage between a father in law and daughter in law by legislation unless both their former spouses had die. Article 12 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2850
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017 Communication number s : 2974/2017 Author: B.P. and P.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Oct 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2866/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAGDONAVICIUS AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAGDONAVICIUS AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 06/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right of 33 applicants of Roma origin to respect for private and family life on account of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46279
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BHR/CO/4 6 NULL 2019 02 27T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BHR/CO/4 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 27 February 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/BHR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a7e5b6f3-e35e-4031-8994-0fd536724a51
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ef2bcb58-bc2d-4a70-8a0f-59a393dcf797
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2022 08 03T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 August 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/18e467c9-deff-4ae2-b9f4-cd401c8e7df1
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2017 05 22T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/BGD/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 22 May 2017 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/20e1933b-fa48-4efc-b2ab-162c6347a54c