Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3561 - 3580 of 3580
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y.G. v. Switzerland
Y.G. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/822/2017 Communication number s : 822/2017 Author: Y.G. represented by counsel Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 22 Apr 2017 Date of decision 26 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/822/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2595/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/23/D/127/1999 Communication number s : 127/1999 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Norway Submission date 25 Jan 1998 Date of decision 19 Nov 1999 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of the JUTBCAT/C/23/D/127/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/220/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
Zündel v. Canada
Z ndel v. Canada CCPR/C/78/D/953/2000 Communication number s : 953/2000 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Canada Submission date 21 Aug 2000 Date of decision 27 Jul 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/953/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/955/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011 Communication number s : 2049/2011 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr 2011 Date of decision 18 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1866/en-US
ZHBANOV v. Bulgaria
ZHBANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/10/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings due to lengthy periods of inactivity at the pre trial stage repeated remittals of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3595
Zare v. Sweden
Zare v. Sweden CAT/C/36/D/256/2004 Communication number s : 256/2004 Author: Mehdi Zare Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Sweden Submission date 22 Sep 2004 Date of decision 12 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/256/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/114/en-US
Zavadskaya et al. v. Belarus
Zavadskaya et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2865/2016 Communication number s : 2865/2016 Author: Svetlana Zavadskaya et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2865/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3174/en-US
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany CERD/C/72/D/38/2006 Communication number s : 038/2006 Author: Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Germany Submission date 29 Aug 2006 JUTBCERD/C/72/D/38/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1732/en-US
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007 Communication number s : 1585/2007 Author: Batyrova Zoolfia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 Jul 2007 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1521/en-US
Černáková v. Slovakia
ern kov v. Slovakia CAT/C/72/D/890/2018 Communication number s : 890/2018 Author: Lucia ern kov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Slovakia Submission date 10 Jul 2018 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/72/D/890/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3337/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
v. Kazakhstan
v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/52/D/497/2012 Communication number s : 497/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Kazakhstan Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/497/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1838/en-US
van der Plaat v. New Zealand
van der Plaat v. New Zealand CCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006 Communication number s : 1492/2006 Author: Ronald van der Plaat Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country New Zealand Submission date 07 Apr 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1376/en-US