Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2861 - 2874 of 2874
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y.G. v. Switzerland
Y.G. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/822/2017 Communication number s : 822/2017 Author: Y.G. represented by counsel Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 22 Apr 2017 Date of decision 26 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/822/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2595/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011 Communication number s : 2049/2011 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr 2011 Date of decision 18 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1866/en-US
Zare v. Sweden
Zare v. Sweden CAT/C/36/D/256/2004 Communication number s : 256/2004 Author: Mehdi Zare Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Sweden Submission date 22 Sep 2004 Date of decision 12 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/256/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/114/en-US
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007 Communication number s : 1585/2007 Author: Batyrova Zoolfia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 Jul 2007 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1521/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
van der Plaat v. New Zealand
van der Plaat v. New Zealand CCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006 Communication number s : 1492/2006 Author: Ronald van der Plaat Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country New Zealand Submission date 07 Apr 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1492/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1376/en-US