Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 581 - 600 of 1295
Compliance Report of Fourth Evaluation Round on the Republic of Moldova
Compliance Report of Fourth Evaluation Round on the Republic of Moldova MDA 2018 12 07 2019 07 24 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova to implement the recommendations issued in GRECOGrecoRC4(2018)10-Final-eng-Moldova-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2018)10-Final-eng-Moldova-PUBLIC
Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Mongolia
Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Mongolia CCPR/C/MNG/CO/6 NULL 2017 08 22T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Mongolia 1.The Committee considered the sixth periodic report of Mongolia CCPR/C/MNG/6 UHRICCPR/C/MNG/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/838c1e55-88ae-43cf-92b8-d8481e82fd8b
Conclusions 2013 - Ukraine - Article 3-1
Conclusions 2013 Ukraine Article 3 1 UKR 03 01 163 06/12/2013 18/12/2013 Article 3 Right to safe and healthy working conditions Paragraph 1 Safety and health regulations The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by ESC2013/def/UKR/3/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2013/def/UKR/3/1/EN
Conclusions 2019 - Latvia - Article 19-1
Conclusions 2019 Latvia Article 19 1 LVA 19 01 000 05/12/2019 26/02/2020 Article 19 Right of migrant workers and their families to protection and assistance Paragraph 1 Assistance and information on migration The Committee takes note of the information ESC2019/def/LVA/19/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2019/def/LVA/19/1/EN
Conclusions XV-1 - Cyprus - Article 1-3
Conclusions XV 1 Cyprus Article 1 3 CYP 01 03 000 31/03/2000 31/03/2000 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 3 Free placement services The Cypriot report provides full and updated information about the structure and functioning of the public employment ESCXV-1/def/CYP/1/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-1/def/CYP/1/3/EN
Conclusions XVI-1 - Portugal - Article 1-3
Conclusions XVI 1 Portugal Article 1 3 PRT 01 03 000 30/05/2003 30/05/2003 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 3 Free placement services The Committee notes from the Portuguese report that Decree Law No. 132/99 of 21 April 1999 lists the principles on which ESCXVI-1/def/PRT/1/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVI-1/def/PRT/1/3/EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Correa Barros et al. v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Correa Barros et al. v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/131/D/2652/2015 Communication number s : 2652/2015 Author: Carlos Jos Correa Barros et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2652/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3242/en-US
D.N. v. Switzerland
D.N. v. Switzerland CHE 29/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of impartiality of the cantonal Administrative Appeals Commission dismissing the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4662
D.T.T. v. Colombia
D.T.T. v. Colombia CCPR/C/107/D/1904/2009 Communication number s : 1904/2009 Author: D.T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Colombia Submission date 18 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1904/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1513/en-US
DAINELIENE v. Lithuania
DAINELIENE v. Lithuania LTU 16/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to carry out a fair and impartial consideration of an appeal on points of law against a ruling of embezzlement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50557
DAKTARAS v. Lithuania
DAKTARAS v. Lithuania LTU 18/01/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lacking impartiality of the Supreme Court as court of cassation as it had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4177
DAUTI v. Albania
DAUTI v. Albania ALB 03/05/2009 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court in proceedings challenging administrative decisions relating to the award of invalidity benefits in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-335
DAVIDSONS AND SAVINS v. Latvia
DAVIDSONS AND SAVINS v. Latvia LVA 07/04/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:49:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of impartiality of the appeal instance court due to the composition of the trial court bench as the same EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28393
DEMIRTAS v. Turkey
DEMIRTAS v. Turkey TUR 16/01/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of State Security Courts. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28815
DERTLI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DERTLI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of State Security Courts. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-29051
DOROZHKO v. Estonia
DOROZHKO v. Estonia EST 24/07/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an impartiality of the tribunal in criminal proceedings due to the fact that the trial judge was married to the head EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3081
DUBUS S.A. v. France
DUBUS S.A. v. France FRA 11/09/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: denial of a fair hearing due to the lack of independence and impartiality of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33273
De Clippele v. Belgium
De Clippele v. Belgium CCPR/C/77/D/1082/2002 Communication number s : 1082/2002 Author: Olivier de Clippele Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Belgium Submission date 08 Mar 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1082/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1047/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, Complaint No. 82/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France Complaint No. 82/2012 FRA 16 00 000 30 00 163 91 175 163 91 212 163 19/03/2013 15/07/2013 European Committee of ESCcc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-en