Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 3622
Amundson v. Czech Republic
Amundson v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006 Communication number s : 1508/2006 Author: Olga Amundson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 13 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1497/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Anti-Doping Convention (ETS No. 135)
Anti Doping Convention ETS No. 135 135 Strasbourg 1989 11 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States the other States Parties to the European Cultural Convention the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for COEETS No. 135https://rm.coe.int/168007b0e0
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: Asmae Taghzouti Ezqouihel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 22 Feb 2021 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/69/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2922/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAARS v. the Netherlands
BAARS v. the Netherlands NLD 28/01/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the denial of costs and compensation for pre trial detention after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4499
BABADAG v. Turkey
BABADAG v. Turkey TUR 12/01/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 16:14:15 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35626
BACCICHETTI v. France
BACCICHETTI v. France FRA 18/05/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair disciplinary proceedings before the National Council of the Medical Order due to non compliance with the adversarial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33053
BACKOVIC v. Serbia
BACKOVIC v. Serbia SRB 07/05/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:00:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to impossibility to seek judicial review of the administrative authorities refusal to register an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8925
BAISCHER v. Austria
BAISCHER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair administrative criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before an Independent Administrative Panel for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-845
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BAKOVA v. Slovakia
BAKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to a public hearing before a tribunal in proceedings concerning a claim for restitution of property. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7869
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to take a formal final decision in the proceedings concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31575
BALAZOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
BALAZOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 25/07/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the Supreme Court s dismissal of an appeal on point of law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6684
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BALSYTE-LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania
BALSYTE LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the inability in administrative proceedings to question the experts on whose expert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4213