Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 181 - 200 of 2366
CAMARA PESTANA v. Portugal
CAMARA PESTANA v. Portugal PRT 16/08/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9491
CAMASSO v. Croatia
CAMASSO v. Croatia HRV 13/04/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12251
CAMEROON: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CAMEROON: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/CMR/CO/5 NULL 2017 11 30T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/CMR/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 30 November 2017 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/CMR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/475f5186-f46c-434d-8f77-e00cdaba235f
CAMPOMIZZI v. Italy
CAMPOMIZZI v. Italy ITA 29/06/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before Court of Audit. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43031
CAN v. Turkey
CAN v. Turkey TUR 05/12/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28723
CANKOCAK v. Turkey
CANKOCAK v. Turkey TUR 20/05/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before Martial Law Courts jurisdiction abolished by law in 1993 and also partly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26806
CANSAD AND OTHERS v. Turkey
CANSAD AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice and lack of a remedy: Unfair criminal proceedings due to their excessive length and lack of access to a lawyer during the initial stage of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49703
CANZANO v. Italy
CANZANO v. Italy ITA 21/02/2001 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceeding before the Court of Audits. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43641
CAPCIKOVA v. Slovakia
CAPCIKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 19/04/2001 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7835
CAPDEVILLE v. Portugal
CAPDEVILLE v. Portugal PRT 09/11/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9443
CARAMAN v. the Republic of Moldova
CARAMAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/09/2020 00:00:00 21/09/2020 17:50:21 Case Description: Functioning of justice / protection of property rights / lack of a remedy: State s failure to enforce final domestic judgments awarding the applicants social EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55893
CARDILLO v. Italy
CARDILLO v. Italy ITA 29/06/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before Court of Audit. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43057
CARIC v. Croatia
CARIC v. Croatia HRV 24/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings due to the comparatively low level of compensation awarded by the Constitutional Court. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12069
CARNASCIALI v. Italy
CARNASCIALI v. Italy ITA 29/01/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property / access to and effective functioning of justice: Interference due to the applicant s prolonged inability to recover possession of her apartment lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44322
CARROZZA v. Italy
CARROZZA v. Italy ITA 19/10/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43778
CARUSO v. Italy
CARUSO v. Italy ITA 05/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before labour courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43139
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 45889/18 BOKOV D. NOR 1/20/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120JUD004588918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215177
CASE OF A. v. CROATIA
CASE OF A. v. CROATIA 55164/08 BEZBRADICA S. HRV 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Protetction against Domestic violence Act Article 215a of the Criminal Code 343 100 464 451 429 310 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD005516408https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101152