Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 541 - 560 of 954
KARATAS AND YILDIZ v. Turkey
KARATAS AND YILDIZ v. Turkey TUR 16/10/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings on account of the fact that the first instance court judgments could not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5636
KAUFMANN v. Italy
KAUFMANN v. Italy ITA 12/10/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court on account of the dismissal by the Court of Cassation of the applicant s appeal on points of law on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45128
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KOCAMAN v. Turkey
KOCAMAN v. Turkey TUR 24/11/2020 00:00:00 19/01/2021 08:26:12 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court on account of the fact that the applicant had been prevented from having his civil claims determined by consumer courts as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56551
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOMANICKY v. Slovakia
KOMANICKY v. Slovakia SVK 04/09/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of an appeal court s decision to proceed with a case in the absence of the party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7819
KONSTAS v. Greece
KONSTAS v. Greece GRC 28/11/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in the light of statements made against the applicant by the deputy Minister for Finance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15603
KORMACHEVA v. Russia
KORMACHEVA v. Russia RUS 14/06/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13541
KYRGYZSTAN : REPORT ON SPT VISIT
KYRGYZSTAN : REPORT ON SPT VISIT CAT/OP/KGZ/1 NULL 2014 02 27T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/KGZ/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 28 February 2014 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English or Degrading Treatment or UHRICAT/OP/KGZ/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b0423c80-aa11-4ef8-bf7f-8986cab6b129
Kulumbetov v. Kazakhstan
Kulumbetov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2547/2015 Communication number s : 2547/2015 Author: Arman Kulumbetov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2547/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3260/en-US
Kurtinbaeva v. Kazakhstan
Kurtinbaeva v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2540/2015 Communication number s : 2540/2015 Author: Ayauzhan Kurtinbaeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2540/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3490/en-US
LIGA PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL PROFISSIONAL v. Portugal
LIGA PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL PROFISSIONAL v. Portugal PRT 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings initially brought against the applicant association before the Lisbon Industrial Tribunal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39525
Laaroussi v. Morocco
Laaroussi v. Morocco CAT/C/74/D/891/2018 Communication number s : 891/2018 Author: Abdel Jalil Laaroussi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Morocco Submission date 19 Oct 2018 Date of decision 15 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/74/D/891/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3615/en-US
Lantsova v. Russian Federation
Lantsova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/74/D/763/1997 Communication number s : 763/1997 Author: Yekaterina Pavlovna Lantsova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Russian Federation Submission date 22 Jul 1996 Date of decision 26 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/763/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/740/en-US
Lederbauer v. Austria
Lederbauer v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006 Communication number s : 1454/2006 Author: Wolfgang Lederbauer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 2005 Date of decision 13 Jul 2007 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1385/en-US
Leirvåg et al. v. Norway
Leirv g et al. v. Norway CCPR/C/82/D/1155/2003 Communication number s : 1155/2003 Author: Unn and Ben Leirv g and their daughter Guro Richard Jansen and his daughter Maria Birgit and Jens Orning and their daughter Pia Suzanne and Irene Gal en and Edvin JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1155/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1298/en-US
Liliane Gröninger et al. v. Germany
Liliane Gr ninger et al. v. Germany CRPD/C/D/2/2010 Communication number s : 002/2010 Author: Liliane Gr ninger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 11 Country Germany Submission date 25 Jun 2010 Date of decision 04 Apr 2014 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/D/2/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2005/en-US
M. G. v. Germany
M. G. v. Germany CCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006 Communication number s : 1482/2006 Author: M. G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Germany Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2008 Comment: A request for interim measures was JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1435/en-US
M.T.B. v. Turkey
M.T.B. v. Turkey TUR 12/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings resulting in the applicants conviction in absentia and refusal of the possibility for a rehearing after learning of their conviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50263
MALTA: REPORT ON VISIT MADE BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON PREVENTION OF TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADVISORY ASSISTANCE TO THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM
MALTA: REPORT ON VISIT MADE BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON PREVENTION OF TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADVISORY ASSISTANCE TO THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM CAT/OP/MLT/1 NULL 2016 01 UHRICAT/OP/MLT/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/79dd53ef-285e-467f-8651-de9ab929aa85