Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 3440
BACCICHETTI v. France
BACCICHETTI v. France FRA 18/05/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair disciplinary proceedings before the National Council of the Medical Order due to non compliance with the adversarial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33053
BACKOVIC v. Serbia
BACKOVIC v. Serbia SRB 07/05/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:00:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to impossibility to seek judicial review of the administrative authorities refusal to register an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8925
BAISCHER v. Austria
BAISCHER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair administrative criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before an Independent Administrative Panel for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-845
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKAN v. Turkey
BAKAN v. Turkey TUR 12/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusals by administrative courts to grant legal aid on the ground that actions were ill founded or that applicants failed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37358
BAKOVA v. Slovakia
BAKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to a public hearing before a tribunal in proceedings concerning a claim for restitution of property. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7869
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to take a formal final decision in the proceedings concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31575
BALAZOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
BALAZOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 25/07/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the Supreme Court s dismissal of an appeal on point of law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6684
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BALSYTE-LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania
BALSYTE LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the inability in administrative proceedings to question the experts on whose expert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4213
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey
BALTA AND DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 23/09/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction on the basis of a statement by an anonymous witness whom neither the applicants nor the trial court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37356
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasoning for a refusal of the domestic courts in 2016 to refer a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51955
BALTINS v. Latvia
BALTINS v. Latvia LVA 08/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:42 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to properly address the incitement plea in criminal proceedings raised by the applicant who claimed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31154
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2022 10 11T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/BGD/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 11 October 2022 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons UHRICRPD/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bd2f6d1f-fe35-4fa7-9485-6afdf2da6256
BAPTISTA DO ROSARIO v. Portugal
BAPTISTA DO ROSARIO v. Portugal PRT 04/04/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9493
BARAC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
BARAC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 13/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Final domestic judgment based on a law which was no longer in forceat the relevant time. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11162
BARATA DIAS v. Portugal
BARATA DIAS v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2001 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9961
BARBIER v. France
BARBIER v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court as a result of the failure by the prison service to transmit a detainee s note to appeal in due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33251
BARFUSS v. the Czech Republic
BARFUSS v. the Czech Republic CZE 31/10/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand and of criminal proceedings. Articles EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6046