Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1021 - 1040 of 1555
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006 Communication number s : 1463/2006 Author: Peter and Eva Gratzinger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Czech Republic Submission date 12 Feb 2006 Date of decision 25 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1383/en-US
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
HAKIMI v. Belgium
HAKIMI v. Belgium BEL 29/09/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the refusal by the court of appeal to reopen in absentia proceedings although the default EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1562
HANSEN v. Norway
HANSEN v. Norway NOR 02/01/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the High Court as an appellate court entrusted with full jurisdiction to give sufficient reasons for its refusal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-211
HARALAMBIE v. Romania
HARALAMBIE v. Romania ROU 27/01/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of private life and Access to and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of the administrative procedure granting access to personal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13091
HARIZI v. France
HARIZI v. France FRA 29/06/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the denial of a deported applicant s representation in the court of appeal on account of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33199
HAULER v. Romania
HAULER v. Romania ROU 12/10/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts refusal to review the lawfulness of administrative decisions concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16165
HELLBORG v. Sweden
HELLBORG v. Sweden SWE 28/05/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to comply with the obligation to issue a building permit within the statutory time limit EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2126
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands NLD 03/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the Court of Appeal s refusal to consider measures that would have enabled the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47531
HUSSAIN v. the United Kingdom
HUSSAIN v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/06/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the judge s refusal to grant the applicant a defendant s costs order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3025
Hamulić et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hamuli et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/113/D/2022/2011 Communication number s : 2022/2011 Author: Nura Hamuli and Halima Hod i Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 18 Nov 2010 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2022/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1992/en-US
Hernández Cortés and Rodríguez Bermúdez v. Spain
Hern ndez Cort s and Rodr guez Berm dez v. Spain E/C.12/72/D/26/2018 Communication number s : 26/2018 Author: Josefa Hern ndez Cort s and Ricardo Rodr guez Berm dez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Spain Submission date 07 Mar JUTBE/C.12/72/D/26/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3743/en-US
Hibaq Said Hashi v. Denmark
Hibaq Said Hashi v. Denmark CCPR/C/120/D/2470/2014 Communication number s : 2470/2014 Author: Hibaq Said Hashi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Denmark Submission date 27 Oct 2014 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2470/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2320/en-US
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/82/D/931/2000 Communication number s : 931/2000 Author: Raihon Hudoyberganova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 1999 Date of decision 05 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/931/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/977/en-US
Human Rights Council hears statement from Austrian President and concludes General debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council MORNING 10 June 2013 The Human Rights Council this morning heard an address by Heinz Fischer the President of Austria and concluded its general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Heinz Fischer the President of Austria said the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/06/human-rights-council-hears-statement-austrian-president-and-concludes
I.A.K. v. Denmark,Iraq
I.A.K. v. Denmark Iraq CCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011 Communication number s : 2115/2011 Author: I.A.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country Denmark Iraq Submission date 01 Jun 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2241/en-US
I.K. v. Denmark
I.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/125/D/2373/2014 Communication number s : 2373/2014 Author: I.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Feb 2014 Date of decision 18 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2373/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2915/en-US
I.M.Y. v. Denmark
I.M.Y. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2559/2015 Communication number s : 2559/2015 Author: I.M.Y. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 25 Jan 2015 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2559/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2232/en-US