Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1081 - 1100 of 1555
KIPS DOO AND DREKALOVIC v. Montenegro
KIPS DOO AND DREKALOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Protection of property access to and effective functioning of justice and lack of a remedy: Unjustified interference due to the refusal by authorities to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50343
KLAMECKI v. Poland (no. 2)
KLAMECKI v. Poland no. 2 POL 03/07/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of correspondence and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Monitoring of correspondence in detention on remand and refusal of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17799
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KORETSKYY AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KORETSKYY AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 03/07/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and association: Unjustified interference due to the refusal to register a non governmental association for environmental protection based on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33461
KORMACHEVA v. Russia
KORMACHEVA v. Russia RUS 14/06/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13541
KOUNOV v. Bulgaria
KOUNOV v. Bulgaria BGR 23/08/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unjustified refusal to reopen the applicant s trial after conviction in absentia. Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14365
KRASIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria
KRASIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/05/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of correspondence and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to return to the applicant items seized in the context of a criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3787
KREUZ v. Poland
KREUZ v. Poland POL 19/06/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to courts of different levels due to domestic courts refusal to grant exoneration from court fees. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17779
KRUMPHOLZ v. Austria
KRUMPHOLZ v. Austria AUT 18/06/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Interference with the right to remain silent and the presumption of innocence due to the Independent Administrative Panel s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1149
KULIKOWSKI v. Poland
KULIKOWSKI v. Poland POL 21/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Lack of access to a court due to a legal aid lawyer s refusal to lodge a cassation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18277
Kadirić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Kadiri v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/115/D/2048/2011 Communication number s : 2048/2011 Author: Emira Kadiri and Dino Kadiri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 24 Jan 2011 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2048/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2088/en-US
Karttunen v. Finland
Karttunen v. Finland CCPR/C/46/D/387/1989 Communication number s : 387/1989 Author: Arvo O. Karttunen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Finland Submission date 02 Nov 1989 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/387/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/402/en-US
Kudrna v. Czech Republic
Kudrna v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/96/D/1582/2007 Communication number s : 1582/2007 Author: Vera Kudrna Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Czech Republic Submission date 23 Dec 2006 Date of decision 21 Jul 2009 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1582/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1529/en-US
Kungurov v. Uzbekistan
Kungurov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/102/D/1478/2006 Communication number s : 1478/2006 Author: Nikolai Kungurov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 20 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1478/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1619/en-US
LAVENTS v. Latvia
LAVENTS v. Latvia LVA 28/02/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31170
LAWYER PARTNERS, A.S. v. Slovakia
LAWYER PARTNERS A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified refusal by domestic courts to register actions submitted by the applicant company in electronic form EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8441
LESJAK v. Croatia
LESJAK v. Croatia HRV 18/05/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal by domestic courts to examine the applicant s case merits and to rule on the lawfulness of his employment termination. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12313
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LOUPAS v. Greece
LOUPAS v. Greece GRC 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of the Supreme Administrative Court to consider certain evidence adduced by the applicant in disciplinary proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54219
LUNDEVALL v. Sweden
LUNDEVALL v. Sweden SWE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings on social benefits before the Administrative Court of Appeal due to its refusal to hold a public hearing. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2110