Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5301 - 5314 of 5314
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
YALCIN v. Turkey
YALCIN v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of State Security Courts. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28571
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. Turkey
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction for having participated in a demonstration to protest against the arrest of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30398
Yashar Agazade v. Azerbaijan
Yashar Agazade v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/126/D/2307/2013 Communication number s : 2307/2013 Author: Yashar Agazade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 06 Nov 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2307/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2793/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Zébié v. Ivory Coast
Z bi v. Ivory Coast CCPR/C/75/D/940/2000 Communication number s : 940/2000 Author: Z bi Aka Bi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Ivory Coast Submission date 01 Aug 1997 Date of decision 09 Jul 2002 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/940/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/974/en-US
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/22/D/24/2014 Communication number s : 24/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 19 Sep 2019 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/24/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3131/en-US
Zheludkova v. Ukraine
Zheludkova v. Ukraine CCPR/C/76/D/726/1996 Communication number s : 726/1996 Author: Tatiana Zheludkova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 1994 Date of decision 29 Oct 2002 Comment: Four individual JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/726/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1018/en-US
de Lorenzo v. Italy
de Lorenzo v. Italy CCPR/C/90/D/1419/2005 Communication number s : 1419/2005 Author: Francesco de Lorenzo Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Italy Submission date 01 Feb 2005 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1419/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1372/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC