Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 2721
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Albania’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Albanian GENEVA 1 May 2019 Albania s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 6 May 2019 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Albania is one of the 14 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2019/05/albanias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Algeria’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 8 November 2022 Algeria s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the fourth time on Friday 11 November 2022 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Algeria is one of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2022/11/algerias-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Algeria’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 3 May 2017 Algeria s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 8 May 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Algeria is one of the 14 States UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/05/algerias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/450/2011 Communication number s : 450/2011 Author: Ali Fadel represented by counsel Tarig Hassan of Advokatur Kanonengasse Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 03 Feb JUTBCAT/C/53/D/450/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2035/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Andorra’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
Catalan Word GENEVA 2 November 2020 Andorra s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Thursday 5 November 2020 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Andorra UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/11/andorras-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Angola’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Portuguese version GENEVA 4 November 2019 Angola s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Thursday 7 November 2019 in a meeting that will be webcast live. UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2019/11/angolas-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Antigua and Barbuda’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 3 November 2021 Antigua and Barbuda s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 8 November 2021 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Antigua and UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2022/01/antigua-and-barbudas-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Argentina’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 18 January 2023 Argentina s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the fourth time on Monday 23 January 2023 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Argentina is one of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2023/01/argentinas-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Argentina’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 2 November 2017 Argentina s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 6 November 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Argentina is one of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/05/argentinas-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Arkauz Arana v. France
Arkauz Arana v. France CAT/C/23/D/63/1997 Communication number s : 063/1997 Author: Josu Arkauz Arana Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 1996 Date of decision 09 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/23/D/63/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/211/en-US
Armenia’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
Armenian GENEVA 20 January 2020 Armenia s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Thursday 23 January 2020 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Armenia is UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/01/armenias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011 Communication number s : 2073/2011 Author: Liliana Assenova Naidenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Bulgaria Submission date 25 Jun 2011 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1464/en-US
Austria’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
German Deutsch GENEVA 19 January 2021 Austria s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Friday 22 January 2021 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Austria UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/01/austrias-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Azerbaijan’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
AzerbaijaniGENEVA 10 May 2018 Azerbaijan s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Tuesday 15 May 2018 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Azerbaijan is UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/05/azerbaijans-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
B.K. v. Switzerland
B.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/828/2017 Communication number s : 828/2017 Author: B.K. represented by counsel Ange Sankieme Lusanga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/67/D/828/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2679/en-US