Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 93
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
BOLIVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BOLIVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/BOL/CO/3 NULL 2022 10 27T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/BOL/CO/3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 27 October 2022 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: Spanish UHRICMW/C/BOL/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a53324bb-3c3e-4da9-9c8a-73354f754669
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJEČNIČKI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJE NI KI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA 36701/09 POSAVEC S. HRV 11/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association Article 11 1 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148181
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
Doolan v. Australia
Doolan v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/18/2013 Communication number s : 18/2013 Author: Manuway Doolan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/18/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3135/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Spain
Fifth Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final 2020 05 27 2020 10 15 ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final Published on 15 October 2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2020)002Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_Op_Spain_EN
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan, Slovenia and Bolivia
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 9 June 2010 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan Slovenia and Bolivia. Marat Beketayev Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Justice of Kazakhstan said UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-kazakhstan
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan, Slovenia and Bolivia
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 9 June 2010 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan Slovenia and Bolivia. Marat Beketayev Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Justice of Kazakhstan said UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-kazakhstan-slovenia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan and Hungary
Human Rights Council MORNING 23 September 2011 Continues General Debate on Human Rights Situations that Require the Council s Attention The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-vincent
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity
Report to HRC A/HRC/38/40/Add.1 from 10 July 2017 to 14 July 2017 9 May 2018 Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity Cuba United Nations A/HRC/38/40/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 May 2018 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/38/40/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f38%2f40%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/43 from 18 November 2003 to 20 November 2003 29 February 2004 Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty Sudan UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/43 29 February UNSPE/CN.4/2004/43https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f43&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2001/106 from 25 September 2000 to 29 September 2000 30 January 2001 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti Haiti E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2001/106 30 January 2001 UNSPE/CN.4/2001/106https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2001%2f106&Lang=en
Leo v. Australia
Leo v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/17/2013 Communication number s : 17/2013 Author: Christopher Leo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/17/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3134/en-US
Lula da Silva v. Brazil
Lula da Silva v. Brazil CCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 INITIAL PROCEEDINGS Communication number s : 2841/2016 Author: Luiz In cio Lula da Silva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Brazil Submission date 28 Jul 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 (INITIAL PROCEEDINGS)https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3115/en-US
Marlon James Noble v. Australia
Marlon James Noble v. Australia CRPD/C/16/D/7/2012 Communication number s : 007/2012 Author: Marlon James Noble Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Australia Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of decision 02 Sep 2016 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/16/D/7/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2144/en-US