Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7041 - 7060 of 7443
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: Ms. S. Strakhova mother of Mr. Maxim Strakhov and Mr. Asad Fayzullaev on behalf of his son Nigmat Type of decision: Decision on JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001,1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3214/en-US
Sudalenko and Poplavny v. Belarus
Sudalenko and Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2691/2015 Communication number s : 2691/2015 Author: Leonid Sudalenko and Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Apr 2015 Date of decision 23 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2691/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3180/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Croatia* - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Croatia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-croatia-report-office-united-nations-high
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security (ETS No. 078A)
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security ETS No. 078A 078A Paris 1972 12 14T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 78 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 078Ahttps://rm.coe.int/1680074619
Sweden should enable Ombuds institutions to investigate discrimination by public authorities and improve integration support for migrant women
Sweden should enable Ombuds institutions to investigate discrimination by public authorities and improve integration support for migrant women SWE 2020 10 01 2020 12 08 Sweden should enable Ombuds institutions to investigate discrimination by public ECRISWE-PR-V-2020-331-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SWE-PR-V-2020-331-ENG
Sylvie Bakatu-Bia v. Sweden
Sylvie Bakatu Bia v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/379/2009 Communication number s : 379/2009 Author: Sylvie Bakatu Bia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 03 Jun 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/46/D/379/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1792/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/39/D/303/2006 Communication number s : 303/2006 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Sep 2006 Date of decision 22 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/39/D/303/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/88/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.T. v. Ukraine
T.T. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017 Communication number s : 2985/2017 Author: T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Apr 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3686/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
TABOR v. Poland
TABOR v. Poland POL 27/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to the Supreme Court on the ground of the absence of reasons for the dismissal of requests for legal aid and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18245
TADDEUCCI AND MC CALL v. Italy
TADDEUCCI AND MC CALL v. Italy ITA 30/09/2016 00:00:00 08/02/2018 14:24:52 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation: Refusal to grant a residence permit for family reason to a same sex foreign partner due to the treatment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45551
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. Hungary
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. Hungary HUN 14/07/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Freedom to receive information: Interference with the applicant association s freedom of information a non governmental organisation active in the field EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11336
TASEV v. North Macedonia
TASEV v. North Macedonia MKD 16/08/2019 00:00:00 26/08/2019 11:34:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unforeseeable interference due to the authorities refusal in 2012 to grant the applicant s request to have his ethnicity entry in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52659
TERNOVSKIS v. Latvia
TERNOVSKIS v. Latvia LVA 29/07/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings in which the applicant contested the authorities refusal to grant the necessary security clearance and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31176
THAILAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
THAILAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/THA/CO/1 NULL 2016 05 12T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/THA/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 12 May 2016 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/THA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8c980399-1baa-4127-a7e8-fb7c6e0faaa8