Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 5195
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALBERT v. Romania
ALBERT v. Romania ROU 16/05/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of proceedings brought by the applicant to challenge a fine of considerable gravity imposed on him for a minor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16645
ALIMUCAJ v. Albania
ALIMUCAJ v. Albania ALB 09/07/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: No punishment without law: Infringement of the principle of legality of criminal offences and punishments due to imposition of a heavier penalty than the one liable for at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-337
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION “ROMUVA” v. Lithuania
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION ROMUVA v. Lithuania LTU 08/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns the non recognition as religious association in 2019 of a non traditional pagan association and lack of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58447
ANGHEL v. Romania
ANGHEL v. Romania ROU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfairness of proceedings brought to challenge the imposition of a fine for having insulted a civil servant due to the failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16613
ARGENTINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ARGENTINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/ARG/CO/5 6 NULL 2017 05 24T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ARG/CO/5 6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 24 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: Spanish or Punishment UHRICAT/C/ARG/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4bc7a72f-cae4-4a7d-bb8b-69edac937fcf
AVETISYAN v. Armenia
AVETISYAN v. Armenia ARM 10/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to restriction of the right to examine witnesses whose testimony played a decisive role in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46121
AYDEMIR v. Turkey
AYDEMIR v. Turkey TUR 24/08/2011 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of home: Vague wording of a search warrant providing no information on the reason for the measure or the objects sought thus not allowing any review of the warrant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5622
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013 Communication number s : 2252/2013 Author: Annadurdy Khadzhiyev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 09 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2480/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105