Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 36
CASE OF ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 24760/94 KALAYDJIEVA Z. BGR 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed abuse of process Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 ill treatment Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002476094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58261
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM 9106/80 N/A BEL 2/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 5 4 Just satisfaction reserved Children s and Young Persons Welfare Act of 8 April 1965 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0229JUD000910680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57445
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF DE JONG, BALJET AND VAN DEN BRINK v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DE JONG BALJET AND VAN DEN BRINK v. THE NETHERLANDS 8805/79 8806/79 9242/81 N/A NLD 5/22/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0522JUD000880579https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57466
CASE OF DUINHOF AND DUIJF v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DUINHOF AND DUIJF v. THE NETHERLANDS 9626/81 9736/82 N/A NLD 5/22/1984 12:00:00 AM Questions of procedure rejected Violation of Art. 5 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Army and Air Force Code of Procedure Rechtspleging bij de Land en ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0522JUD000962681https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57474
CASE OF E. v. NORWAY
CASE OF E. v. NORWAY 11701/85 N/A NOR 8/29/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Penal Code Article 39 para. 1 e and f 448 297 481 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0829JUD001170185https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57634
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 5100/71 5101/71 5102/71 5354/72 5370/72 N/A NLD 6/8/1976 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 2 No violation of Art. 6 3 b No violation of Art. 6 3 c No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:0608JUD000510071https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57479
CASE OF FARMAKOPOULOS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF FARMAKOPOULOS v. BELGIUM 11683/85 N/A BEL 3/27/1992 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list 448 481 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0327JUD001168385 In the case of Farmakopoulos v. Belgium The European Court of Human Rights sitting inaccordance with Article 43 art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0327JUD001168385https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57776
CASE OF FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FOX CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 12244/86 12245/86 12383/86 N/A GBR 8/30/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 2 Violation of Art. 5 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 and 13 Just satisfaction reserved 1978 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0830JUD001224486https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57721
CASE OF GORSHKOV v. UKRAINE
CASE OF GORSHKOV v. UKRAINE 67531/01 N/A UKR 11/8/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine under Art. 13 Constitution of Ukraine 1996 article 55 Criminal Code of Ukraine 2001 Decree of 5 January 1988 of the Presidium of the Supreme ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD006753101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70855
CASE OF GULUB ATANASOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF GULUB ATANASOV v. BULGARIA 73281/01 NEDEVA E. BGR 11/6/2008 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD007328101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89390
CASE OF HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA 10533/83 N/A AUT 9/24/1992 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 3 No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001053383https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57781
CASE OF HUBER v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF HUBER v. SWITZERLAND 12794/87 N/A CHE 10/23/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings 448 30 481 343 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1023JUD001279487https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57644
CASE OF HUSSAIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HUSSAIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21928/93 N/A GBR 2/21/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Children and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0221JUD002192893https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57976
CASE OF IRIBARNE PÉREZ v. FRANCE
CASE OF IRIBARNE P REZ v. FRANCE 16462/90 N/A FRA 10/24/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 4 Code of Criminal Procedure Law no. 84 1150 of 21 December 1984 Article 713 1 to 8 D. 505 710 Circular of the Minister of Justice of 8 February 1983 448 438 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1024JUD001646290https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57959
CASE OF KADEM v. MALTA
CASE OF KADEM v. MALTA 55263/00 N/A MLT 1/9/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 5 4 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109JUD005526300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60878
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS 12228/86 N/A NLD 10/25/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 2 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Netherlands Criminal Code Article 37 448 228 459 456 220 307 351 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001222886https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57637
CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM 11613/85 N/A BEL 9/24/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 14 128 448 228 456 220 135 481 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001161385 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001161385https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57742
CASE OF LAMY v. BELGIUM
CASE OF LAMY v. BELGIUM 10444/83 N/A BEL 3/30/1989 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 2 and 5 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 b Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0330JUD001044483https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57514
CASE OF LETELLIER v. FRANCE
CASE OF LETELLIER v. FRANCE 12369/86 N/A FRA 6/26/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 No violation of Art. 5 4 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0626JUD001236986https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57678