Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
Broeks v. Netherlands
Broeks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/172/1984 Communication number s : 172/1984 Author: S.W.M. Broeks represented by Marie Emmie Diepstraten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Jun 1984 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/172/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/653/en-US
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/742/1997 Communication number s : 742/1997 Author: Pamela R. M. Byrne and Linda E. Lazarescu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 23 Apr 1996 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/742/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/775/en-US
Dranichnikov v. Australia
Dranichnikov v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004 Communication number s : 1291/2004 Author: Olga Dranichnikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 20 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1327/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
Jacobs v. Belgium
Jacobs v. Belgium CCPR/C/81/D/943/2000 Communication number s : 943/2000 Author: Guido Jacobs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Belgium Submission date 15 Mar 2000 Date of decision 07 Jul 2004 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/943/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1120/en-US
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/75/D/902/1999 Communication number s : 902/1999 Author: Juliet Joslin Jennifer Rowan Margaret Pearl and Lindsay Zelf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country New Zealand Submission date 30 Nov 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/902/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/995/en-US
Müller and Engelhard v. Namibia
M ller and Engelhard v. Namibia CCPR/C/74/D/919/2000 Communication number s : 919/2000 Author: Michael Andreas M ller and Imke Engelhard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Namibia Submission date 29 Oct 1999 Date of decision 26 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/919/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/963/en-US
Maya Nepal v. Nepal
Maya Nepal v. Nepal CCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015 Communication number s : 2615/2015 Author: Devi Maya Nepal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Nepal Submission date 24 Mar 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3187/en-US
Nguyen v. Netherlands
Nguyen v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/36/D/3/2004 Communication number s : 003/2004 Author: Dung Thi Thuy Nguyen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Dec 2003 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/3/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1717/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US
Vos (A.P. Johannes) v. Netherlands
Vos A.P. Johannes v. Netherlands CCPR/C/66/D/786/1997 Communication number s : 786/1997 Author: A.P. Johannes Vos Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Jul 1996 Date of decision 26 Jul 1999 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/786/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/787/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US