Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2901 - 2920 of 2982
Sroub v. Czech Republic
Sroub v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1573/2007 Communication number s : 1573/2007 Author: Vaclav Sroub Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 03 Dec 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1573/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1543/en-US
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Stewart v. Canada
Stewart v. Canada CCPR/C/58/D/538/1993 Communication number s : 538/1993 Author: Charles E. Stewart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Canada Submission date 18 Feb 1993 Date of decision 01 Nov 1996 Comment: Five individual JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/538/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/551/en-US
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017 Communication number s : 3061/2017 Author: Jaarey Suleymanova and Gulnaz Israfilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 26 Jul 2017 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3165/en-US
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Croatia* - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Croatia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-croatia-report-office-united-nations-high
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on the United States of America - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on the United UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-united-states-america-report-office-united
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/TJK/CO/2 NULL 2019 05 09T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/TJK/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 9 May 2019 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of Their UHRICMW/C/TJK/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7a20a75d-f70c-43c9-ae7c-43dfffe56dec
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack of regulation of home birth resulted in a situation incompatible with the notion of foreseeability and lawfulness. Therefore the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11570
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/MKD/1 NULL 2019 05 10T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/MKD/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 10 May 2019 Convention against Torture and Other UHRICAT/OP/MKD/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c08fa3f7-6648-4d34-860e-e11660369e32
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TKM/CO/2 NULL 2017 04 20T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TKM/CO/2 International Covenant on Distr.: General 20 April 2017 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TKM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b779aa9a-855e-4456-9133-f1d672f7ae90
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal CCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018 Communication number s : 3199/2018 Author: Puniram Tharu and Nira Kumari Tharuni Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Nepal Submission date 28 Mar 2018 Date of decision 14 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3080/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding Theme II RUS 2012 03 23 2012 08 13 Strasbourg 22 March 2012 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2011 6E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the United Kingdom on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the United Kingdom on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II GBR 2008 02 15 2008 04 03 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 15 February 2008 Public Greco GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-3E-Final-United-Kingdom-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-3E-Final-United-Kingdom-PF-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on Bulgaria
Third Opinion on Bulgaria BGR ACFC/OP/III 2014 001 2014 02 11 Strasbourg 30 July 2014 Public ACFC/OP/III 2014 001 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Bulgaria adopted on 11 February FCNMACFC/OP/III(2014)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Bulgaria_en
Third Opinion on Estonia
Third Opinion on Estonia EST ACFC/OP/III 2011 004 2011 04 01 Strasbourg 7 November 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 004 ADVISORY COMMITTE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Estonia adopted on 1 April 2011 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Estonia_en
Third Opinion on Latvia
Third Opinion on Latvia LVA ACFC/OP/III 2018 001 2018 02 23 Public ACFC/OP/III 2018 001 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Latvia adopted on 23 February 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Society FCNMACFC/OP/III(2018)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Latvia_en