Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 296
Fourth Opinion on Germany
Fourth Opinion on Germany DEU ACFC/OP/IV 2015 003 2015 03 19 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 19 March 2015 ACFC/OP/IV 2015 003 Fourth Opinion on Germany adopted on 19 March 2015 EXECUTIVE FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2015)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Germany_en
Fourth Opinion on Lithuania
Fourth Opinion on Lithuania LTU ACFC/OP/IV 2018 004 2018 05 30 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Restricted ACFC/OP/IV 2018 004 Fourth Opinion on Lithuania adopted on 30 May 2018 Summary Lithuanian FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2018)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Lithuania_en
Fourth Opinion on Poland
Fourth Opinion on Poland POL ACFC/OP/IV 2019 003 2019 11 06 2020 01 23 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2019 003 Fourth Opinion on Poland adopted on 6 November 2019 Summary Persons FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Op_Poland_EN
Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom
Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/IV 2016 005 2016 05 25 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 27 February 2017 ACFC/OP/IV 2016 005 Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom adopted FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2016)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_UnitedKingdom_en
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Poland
Government comments on the second report on Poland POL 1999 12 10 2000 06 27 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Poland. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIPOL-COM-II-2002-034-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=POL-COM-II-2002-034-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands NLD 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Netherlands ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRINLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENG
H. E-M. v. Canada
H. E M. v. Canada CAT/C/46/D/395/2009 Communication number s : 395/2009 Author: H. E M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 17 Aug 2009 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/46/D/395/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/54/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Somalia, Seychelles and Solomon Islands
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 21 September 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Somalia the Seychelles and the Solomon Islands. Yusuf Mohamed Ismail Permanent Representative of Somalia to the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-somalia
I.A.K. v. Denmark,Iraq
I.A.K. v. Denmark Iraq CCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011 Communication number s : 2115/2011 Author: I.A.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country Denmark Iraq Submission date 01 Jun 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2241/en-US
J.M. v. Chile
J.M. v. Chile CRC/C/90/D/121/2020 Communication number s : 121/2020 Author: N.E.R. . Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Chile Submission date 09 Jul 2020 Date of decision 01 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/90/D/121/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3055/en-US
J.Y. v. France
J.Y. v. France CCPR/C/131/D/2944/2017 Communication number s : 2944/2017 Author: J.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country France Submission date 31 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2944/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3250/en-US
M.A.M.A. et al. v. Sweden
M.A.M.A. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/48/D/391/2009 Communication number s : 391/2009 Author: M.A.M.A. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Jul 2009 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/48/D/391/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/27/en-US
M.H. v. Finland
M.H. v. Finland CRC/C/83/D/23/2017 Communication number s : 023/2017 Author: M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Finland Submission date 29 Mar 2017 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/23/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2628/en-US
N.A.A. v. Switzerland
N.A.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/60/D/639/2014 Communication number s : 639/2014 Author: N.A.A. represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Switzerland Submission date 14 Nov 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 JUTBCAT/C/60/D/639/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2255/en-US
Nell Toussaint v. Canada
Nell Toussaint v. Canada CCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014 Communication number s : 2348/2014 Author: Nell Toussaint Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Canada Submission date 24 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2541/en-US