Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8961 - 8980 of 9396
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/862/2018 Communication number s : 862/2018 Author: T.B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/862/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3139/en-US
T.C. v. Peru
T.C. v. Peru CAT/C/75/D/930/2019 Communication number s : 930/2019 Author: T.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Peru Submission date 31 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/75/D/930/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3738/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.J. v. Lithuania
T.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009 Communication number s : 1911/2009 Author: T.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1329/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
T. v. the United Kingdom
T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Denial of a fair trial due to the applicants inability minors aged 10 at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2452
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/TJK/CO/2 NULL 2019 05 09T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/TJK/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 9 May 2019 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of Their UHRICMW/C/TJK/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7a20a75d-f70c-43c9-ae7c-43dfffe56dec
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TASE v. Romania
TASE v. Romania ROU 10/09/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: unlawful placement in detention on remand and lack of pertinent and sufficient reasons for extending detention on remand as well as lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13087
TATAR v. Romania
TATAR v. Romania ROU 06/07/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:34:15 Case Description: Protection of private family life and home: Breach by the State of its obligations to assess risks and consequences of hazardous industrial process and to keep the public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17620
TATISHVILI v. Russia
TATISHVILI v. Russia RUS 09/07/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Freedom of movement and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful refusal to register the applicant as resident at her home address and failure by domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13641