Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9281 - 9300 of 9396
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/36/47/Add.1 from 10 October 2016 to 19 October 2016 12 September 2017 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Central African UNSPA/HRC/36/47/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f47%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
X. J. v. Netherlands
X. J. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008 Communication number s : 1840/2008 Author: X. J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1249/en-US
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X, Y and others v. Sweden
X Y and others v. Sweden CAT/C/67/D/816/2017 Communication number s : 816/2017 Author: X Y and others Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Mar 2017 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: Views non violation. JUTBCAT/C/67/D/816/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2624/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X and Y v. Netherlands
X and Y v. Netherlands CAT/C/15/D/31/1995 Communication number s : 031/1995 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 15 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Sep 1995 Date of decision 20 Nov 1995 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/15/D/31/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/224/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/807/2017 Communication number s : 807/2017 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/807/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3372/en-US
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US