Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7981 - 8000 of 8052
X. H. L. v. Netherlands
X. H. L. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007 Communication number s : 1564/2007 Author: X. H. L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Jan 2007 Date of decision 22 Jul 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1507/en-US
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/807/2017 Communication number s : 807/2017 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/807/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3372/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Hungary
X v. Hungary CCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016 Communication number s : 2901/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Hungary Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2901/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3285/en-US
X. v. Netherlands
X. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1886/2009 Communication number s : 1886/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Oct 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1886/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1279/en-US
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X. v. Sri Lanka
X. v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013 Communication number s : 2256/2013 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 11 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2344/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/765/2016 Communication number s : 765/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Aug 2016 Date of decision 23 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/765/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2591/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569