Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2861 - 2873 of 2873
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/13/D/18/1994 Communication number s : 018/1994 Author: X name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Sep 1994 Date of decision 17 Nov 1994 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/13/D/18/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/265/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
Y.B. v. Russian Federation
Y.B. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010 Communication number s : 1983/2010 Author: Y.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Russian Federation Submission date 06 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1813/en-US
Z.H. v. Canada
Z.H. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 Communication number s : 604/2014 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 18 May 2014 Date of decision 20 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/604/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2071/en-US
Zapescu v. Republic of Moldova
Zapescu v. Republic of Moldova CERD/C/103/D/60/2016 Communication number s : 60/2016 Author: Grigore Zapescu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 30 Jun 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2021 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/103/D/60/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3023/en-US
c("Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )", "Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )")
c Document/information Follow up Information c A/HRC/36/61 A/HRC/36/61 c c 27 July 2017 27 July 2017 c Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia Cambodia third official country visit Special Rapporteur on the situation of human UNSPc("A/HRC/36/61", "A/HRC/36/61")https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f61&Lang=en
de León Castro v. Spain
de Le n Castro v. Spain CCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005 Communication number s : 1388/2005 Author: Jos Luis de Le n Castro Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Spain Submission date 23 Aug 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar 2009 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1016/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Denmark,France,Paraguay,Switzerland
v. Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland CRC/C/92/2 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 83/2019 31/201774/2019 .30/2017 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 92 Country Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland Submission date Date JUTBCRC/C/92/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3755/en-US