Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 261 - 280 of 5250
CASE OF CAVANI v. HUNGARY
CASE OF CAVANI v. HUNGARY 5493/13 THUAN DIT DIEUDONNE G. HUN 10/28/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1028JUD000549313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-147624
CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN
CASE OF CENTRUM F R R TTVISA v. SWEDEN 35252/08 BERGMAN F. SWE 6/19/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD003525208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183863
CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN
CASE OF CENTRUM F R R TTVISA v. SWEDEN 35252/08 BERMAN F. EVANS A. SWE 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD003525208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210078
CASE OF CEVRİOĞLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF CEVR O LU v. TURKEY 69546/12 YALCIN M. TUR 10/4/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD006954612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166936
CASE OF CHABROWSKI v. UKRAINE
CASE OF CHABROWSKI v. UKRAINE 61680/10 WOZNIAK SZYMANEK B. UKR 1/17/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0117JUD006168010 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0117JUD006168010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115888
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF CHAPMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAPMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 27238/95 GBR 1/18/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 14 Caravan Sites Act 1968 Ss. 6 10 11 12 16 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Ss. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002723895https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59154
CASE OF CHAPPELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAPPELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10461/83 N/A GBR 3/30/1989 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Anton Piller order 451 429 319 268 426 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0330JUD001046183 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF CHAPPELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. 10461/83 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0330JUD001046183https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57459
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 25088/94 28331/95 28443/95 N/A FRA 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 14 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002508894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58288
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA
CASE OF CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW v. RUSSIA 18147/02 HODKIN P. KRYLOVA G. KUZMICHEV M. RUS 4/5/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed victim Violation of Art. 11 9 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD001814702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80038
CASE OF CIOCODEICĂ v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CIOCODEIC v. ROMANIA 27413/09 PINTILIE A. ROU 1/16/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 P1 1 1 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116JUD002741309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180288
CASE OF CIORAP v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF CIORAP v. MOLDOVA 12066/02 IORDACHI V. MDA 6/19/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 3 conditions of detention Violation of Art. 3 force feeding Violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 8 censorship of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619JUD001206602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81136
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 32492/96 32547/96 32548/96 33209/96 33210/96 N/A BEL 6/22/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 in respect of Mr Coeme fair hearing Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 and 6 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59194
CASE OF COPLAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COPLAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 62617/00 WELCH J. GBR 4/3/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Data Protection Act 1984 1988 Human Rights Act 1998 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403JUD006261700https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-79996
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 292/06 43490/06 HOLINER D. KRYLOVA G. RUS 11/23/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 Procedural safeguards ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD000029206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213717
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL 56402/12 PRT 4/4/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Article 6 3 c Defence in person Article 6 Right to a fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182243
CASE OF COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 13472/18 HRIPLIV I N. VIERU V. POSTICA A. MDA 3/22/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD001347218https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216352
CASE OF COSTEL POPA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF COSTEL POPA v. ROMANIA 47558/10 POPESCU N. ROU 4/26/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association Article 11 1 Freedom of association 145 146 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD004755810 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF COSTEL POPA v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD004755810https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162206