Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3601 - 3620 of 3626
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X. H. L. v. Netherlands
X. H. L. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007 Communication number s : 1564/2007 Author: X. H. L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Jan 2007 Date of decision 22 Jul 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1564/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1507/en-US
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X.Y. v. Switzerland
X.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/128/1999 Communication number s : 128/1999 Author: X.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Mar 1999 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/26/D/128/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/196/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/470/2011 Communication number s : 470/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Monique Bremi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Jul 2011 Date of decision 24 Nov 2014 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/470/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2040/en-US
Y.B. v. Russian Federation
Y.B. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010 Communication number s : 1983/2010 Author: Y.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Russian Federation Submission date 06 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1983/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1813/en-US
Y.R. v. Russian Federation
Y.R. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/72/D/869/2018 Communication number s : 869/2018 Author: Y.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/72/D/869/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3351/en-US
Y.S. v. Australia
Y.S. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/633/2014 Communication number s : 633/2014 Author: Y.S. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 10 Oct 2014 Date of decision 15 Nov 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/633/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2195/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Z v. Switzerland v. Switzerland
Z v. Switzerland v. Switzerland CAT/C/54/D/468/2011 Communication number s : 468/2011 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Jun 2011 Date of decision 05 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/468/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1981/en-US
Zalesskaya v. Belarus
Zalesskaya v. Belarus CCPR/C/101/D/1604/2007 Communication number s : 1604/2007 Author: Elena Zalesskaya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Belarus Submission date 08 Feb 2007 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1604/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1636/en-US
Ziablitsev v. France
Ziablitsev v. France E/C.12/71/D/176/2020 Communication number s : 176/2020 Author: Sergei Ziablitsev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country France Submission date 06 Jan 2020 Date of decision 02 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/71/D/176/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3000/en-US