Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 2843
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Latvia
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Latvia LVA 2020 10 29 2021 01 11 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Latvia was adopted at GRECO s 58th Plenary Meeting 7 December 2012 and made public on 17 December 2012 following authorisation GRECOGrecoRC4(2020)15-Final-eng-Latvia-ADD-to-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2020)15-Final-eng-Latvia-ADD-to-2ndRC-PUBLIC
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014 Communication number s : 2483/2014 Author: Vladimir Adyrkhayev Behruz Solikhov and the Religious Association of Jehovah s Witnesses in Dushanb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3555/en-US
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Aouali, Faraoun and Bouregba v. Algeria
Aouali Faraoun and Bouregba v. Algeria CCPR/C/109/D/1884/2009 Communication number s : 1884/2009 Author: Mouni Aouali Feryale Faraoun and Fatiha Bouregba Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1884/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1687/en-US
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US