Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2481 - 2500 of 3253
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) Slovenia
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention Slovenia SVN exe 2021 06 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) TURKEY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention TURKEY TUR a15 a22 a25 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
Gabriel Osío Zamora v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Gabriel Os o Zamora v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012 Communication number s : 2203/2012 Author: Gabriel Os o Zamora Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 25 JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2349/en-US
Gauthier v. Canada
Gauthier v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/633/1995 Communication number s : 633/1995 Author: Robert Gauthier Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 01 Jan 1995 Date of decision 07 Apr 1999 Comment: Exact date of submission JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/633/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/768/en-US
Gedumbe v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Gedumbe v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/75/D/641/1995 Communication number s : 641/1995 Author: Nyekuma Kopita Toro Gedumbe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission date 01 Jan 1995 JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/641/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/975/en-US
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/77/D/836/1998 Communication number s : 836/1998 Author: Kestutis Gelazauskas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Apr 1997 Date of decision 17 Mar 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/836/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1036/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Gorka-Joseba Lupiañez Mintegi v. Spain
Gorka Joseba Lupia ez Mintegi v. Spain CCPR/C/125/D/2657/2015 Communication number s : 2657/2015 Author: Gorka Joseba Lupia ez Mintegi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Spain Submission date 23 Jun 2015 Date of decision 21 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2657/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2919/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta MLT 2013 06 20 2013 10 15 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI in accordance with its country ECRIMLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Germany
Government comments on the second report on Germany DEU 2000 12 15 2001 07 03 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Germany. ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDEU-COM-II-2001-036-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DEU-COM-II-2001-036-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Portugal
Government comments on the third report on Portugal PRT 2006 06 30 2007 02 13 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIPRT-COM-III-2007-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-III-2007-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Government comments on the third report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of ECRIMKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation RUS 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Russian Federation ECRI wishes to point out ECRIRUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENG
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010 Communication number s : 2013/2010 Author: Oleg Grishkovtsov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Dec 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: Imposition of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1915/en-US
Groupe d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v. France
Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007 Communication number s : 012/2007 Author: Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1709/en-US