Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3161 - 3180 of 3591
Romanchik v. Belarus
Romanchik v. Belarus CCPR/C/135/D/3240/2018 Communication number s : 3240/2018 Author: Alla Romanchik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Belarus Submission date 08 May 2017 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3240/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3683/en-US
Rosenberg and Jacquart v. France
Rosenberg and Jacquart v. France CCPR/C/130/D/2584/2015 Communication number s : 2584/2015 Author: Alain Rosenberg and Sabine Jacquart Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country France Submission date 15 Dec 2014 Date of decision 14 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2584/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3299/en-US
Rouba Alhaj Ali v. Morocco
Rouba Alhaj Ali v. Morocco CAT/C/58/D/682/2015 Communication number s : 682/2015 Author: Rouba Alhaj Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Morocco Submission date 22 May 2015 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/58/D/682/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2162/en-US
Ruzimatov et al v. Turkmenistan
Ruzimatov et al v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/136/D/3285/2019 Communication number s : 3285/2019 Author: Rashid Ruzimatov Irina Kakabaeva and Rakhim Ruzimatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 09 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3285/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3724/en-US
S.A. et al. v. Greece
S.A. et al. v. Greece CCPR/C/121/D/2868/2016 Communication number s : 2868/2016 Author: S.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Greece Submission date 24 Jun 2016 Date of decision 10 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2868/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2363/en-US
S.B. v. Cameroon
S.B. v. Cameroon CAT/C/75/D/1034/2020 Communication number s : 1034/2020 Author: S.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cameroon Submission date 02 Jul 2020 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1034/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3760/en-US
S.C. SCUT S.A. v. Romania
S.C. SCUT S.A. v. Romania ROU 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the imposition in 2009 of mining royalties to a private company dealing with sand extraction which was found to be arbitrary on account of lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50377
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
S. C. and G. P. v. Italy
S. C. and G. P. v. Italy E/C.12/65/D/22/2017 Communication number s : 022/2017 Author: S. C. and G. P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Italy Submission date 20 Mar 2017 Date of decision 07 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBE/C.12/65/D/22/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2522/en-US
S.D.P.T., Y.F.R.T. and P.T. v. Canada
S.D.P.T. Y.F.R.T. and P.T. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/2034/2011 Communication number s : 2034/2011 Author: S.D.P.T. Y.F.R.T. and P.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 27 Mar 2011 Date of decision 29 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2034/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3083/en-US
S.H. v. Finland
S.H. v. Finland CRC/C/81/D/6/2016 Communication number s : 006/2016 Author: S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Finland Submission date 16 Jul 2016 Date of decision 15 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/81/D/6/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2524/en-US
S.R. v. Lithuania
S.R. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/132/D/3313/2019 Communication number s : 3313/2019 Author: S.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Lithuania Submission date 23 Nov 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3313/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3172/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
Sánchez López v. Spain
S nchez L pez v. Spain CCPR/C/67/D/777/1997 Communication number s : 777/1997 Author: Antonio S nchez L pez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Spain Submission date 22 Oct 1996 Date of decision 18 Oct 1999 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/777/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/848/en-US
SAINT LUCIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAINT LUCIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/LCA/CO/2 4 NULL 2014 07 07T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/LCA/CO/2 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 8 July 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/LCA/CO/2-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/54fc6258-717d-4a3c-9a07-060ece0e2f90
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain ESP 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability of the applicant to have a higher court review the imposition of a fine for an offence which although classified as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56051
SAUDI ARABIA: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAUDI ARABIA: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPSC/SAU/CO/1 NULL 2018 10 31T00:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/SAU/CO/1 Distr.: General Convention on theRights of the Child 31 October 2018 Original: English Committee on the Rights of the UHRICRC/C/OPSC/SAU/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/eb1697fd-0148-4506-a01a-0536e1c9ebf0
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 30/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary and disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a fine on a commercial company by the State Consumer Rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49465
SENEGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SENEGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CED/C/SEN/CO/1 NULL 2017 04 18T00:00:00 CED United Nations CED/C/SEN/CO/1 International Convention for Distr.: General 18 April 2017 the Protection of All Persons English from Enforced Disappearance Original: French UHRICED/C/SEN/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/469174c5-f765-483a-b1a7-a70cfa338f2b
SEPCZYNSKI v. Poland
SEPCZYNSKI v. Poland POL 26/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention protection of property: Inadequate medical care in prison disproportionate interference due to the imposition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49467