Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3981 - 4000 of 4308
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Malawi - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/MWI/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Malawi UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/MWI/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-malawi-report-office-united-nations-high
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/39/D/303/2006 Communication number s : 303/2006 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Sep 2006 Date of decision 22 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/39/D/303/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/88/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
TARABURCA v. the Republic of Moldova
TARABURCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 06/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / action of security forces and lack of an effective remedy: Ill treatment of and injuries caused to the applicants in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6970
TARVERDIYEV v. Azerbaijan
TARVERDIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 26/10/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1757
TAXQUET v. Belgium
TAXQUET v. Belgium BEL 16/11/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the insufficient safeguards enabling the applicant to understand the reasons why he had been found EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1485
TCHANKOTADZE v. Georgia
TCHANKOTADZE v. Georgia GEO 12/09/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful detention on remand of the chairperson of the Civil Aviation Agency of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5820
TEKIN AND ARSLAN v. Belgium
TEKIN AND ARSLAN v. Belgium BEL 05/12/2017 00:00:00 23/01/2018 11:19:34 Case Description: Right to life: Excessive use of force resulting in the death of a mentally ill prisoner after being restrained in a stranglehold by a prison officer. Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48745
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/MKD/1 NULL 2019 05 10T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/MKD/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 10 May 2019 Convention against Torture and Other UHRICAT/OP/MKD/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c08fa3f7-6648-4d34-860e-e11660369e32
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia
TIMOFEYEV v. Russia RUS 23/01/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice/Protection of property/Effective remedy: Non enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning the State s monetary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27520
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/TKM/CO/2 NULL 2018 10 30T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/TKM/CO/2 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 31 October 2018 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/TKM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/fa405144-ad7c-4162-a45b-af3583a93aef
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
Tadman and Prentice v. Canada
Tadman and Prentice v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1481/2006 Communication number s : 1481/2006 Author: Grant Tadman and Jeff Prentice Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 17 Nov 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1481/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1006/en-US
Tadman et al. v. Canada
Tadman et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/67/D/816/1998 Communication number s : 816/1998 Author: Grant Tadman et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 11 Apr 1997 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/816/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/835/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US