Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5001 - 5020 of 5283
POPADIC v. Serbia
POPADIC v. Serbia SRB 20/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the excessively lengthy matrimonial proceedings which lasted four years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62246
POPARA v. Croatia
POPARA v. Croatia HRV 15/06/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to a court due to the automatic stay of civil proceedings brought against the State for damages resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10083
POROPAT v. Slovenia
POROPAT v. Slovenia SVN 09/08/2017 00:00:00 05/09/2017 11:50:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial a fair trial on account of the courts refusal to admit evidence the applicant had wished to adduce in criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47585
POSTOLACHE v. Romania (no. 2)
POSTOLACHE v. Romania no. 2 ROU 22/11/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to excessive court fees. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17091
POZDER v. Croatia
POZDER v. Croatia HRV 13/01/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the fact that between 2013 2015 the domestic courts failed to grant the applicant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59379
PRAMOV v. Bulgaria
PRAMOV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/12/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court to obtain a decision on the lawfulness of the applicants dismissal from the Bulgarian State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14611
PRANJIC-M-LUKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
PRANJIC M LUKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 02/09/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities interference with the applicant s right to respect for his private life due to his subjection in 2013 to involuntary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56345
PRIZZIA v. Hungary
PRIZZIA v. Hungary HUN 11/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning violations of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to take effective steps to enforce the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10599
PRODANOV v. North Macedonia
PRODANOV v. North Macedonia MKD 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to access to a court because of the manner in which the Supreme Court in 2012 applied the Civil Procedure Act EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57731
PRODUKCIJA PLUS STORITVENO PODJETJE D.O.O. v. Slovenia
PRODUKCIJA PLUS STORITVENO PODJETJE D.O.O. v. Slovenia SVN 23/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant company s right to a fair trial on account of the fact that in 2013 the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51359
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION 'ETICA' v. Romania
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION ETICA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2018 00:00:00 16/08/2018 15:03:14 Case Description: In December 2007 police officers proceeded without any order issued by a prosecutor to a search at the applicant organisation s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50091
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
PRUTEANU v. Romania
PRUTEANU v. Romania ROU 03/05/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns the absence of sufficient safeguards under the former Code of Criminal Procedure CCP in force until 2014 as regards the interception and the use in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13099
PULJIC v. Croatia
PULJIC v. Croatia HRV 08/10/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal or minor offence proceedings due to the inability for the applicant to examine a key witness whose statement was of decisive importance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56073
PUTINTSEVA v. Russia
PUTINTSEVA v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Right to life / Action of security forces: Failure to protect the right to life of the applicant s son who was shot dead in 2002 in an attempt to escape the military unit EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13853
Palandjian and Palandjian v. Hungary
Palandjian and Palandjian v. Hungary CCPR/C/80/D/1106/2002 Communication number s : 1106/2002 Author: Rebecca Palandjian and Aghabab Palandjian Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Hungary Submission date 21 Jun 1999 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1106/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1052/en-US
Petromelidis v. Greece
Petromelidis v. Greece CCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017 Communication number s : 3065/2017 Author: Lazaros Petromelidis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Greece Submission date 31 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3196/en-US
Pohl et al. v. Austria
Pohl et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003 Communication number s : 1160/2003 Author: Godfried and Ingrid Pohl Wolfgang Mayer Franz Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 23 Sep 2002 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1114/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US