Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5201 - 5220 of 5283
Toonen v. Australia
Toonen v. Australia CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 Communication number s : 488/1992 Author: Nicholas Toonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/488/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/702/en-US
Tsarjov v. Estonia
Tsarjov v. Estonia CCPR/C/91/D/1223/2003 Communication number s : 1223/2003 Author: Vjatseslav Tsarjov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Estonia Submission date 14 Aug 2003 Date of decision 26 Oct 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1223/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1371/en-US
U.A. v. Canada
U.A. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/767/2016 Communication number s : 767/2016 Author: U.A. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 16 Aug 2016 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/767/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2744/en-US
U.M.H. v. Sweden
U.M.H. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016 Communication number s : 2742/2016 Author: U.M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2845/en-US
UJ v. Hungary
UJ v. Hungary HUN 19/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to a journalist s criminal conviction for defamation in respect of a newspaper article criticizing wine produced by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10639
ULGER v. Turkey
ULGER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Domestic courts refusal to transmit a copy of a favourable judgment necessary for enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37136
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-819
UNEL v. Turkey
UNEL v. Turkey TUR 27/08/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the failure of the trial court to examine the evidence video and voice recordings accusing the applicant of bribery and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37226
URH v. Croatia
URH v. Croatia HRV 13/01/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right on account that he had been prosecuted and tried twice for the same offence before the Minor Offences Court in 2011 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59405
URUN v. Turkey
URUN v. Turkey TUR 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of domestic proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45925
UZAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
UZAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the preventive measures imposed on the applicants property that lasted from 10 to 15 years on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52495
V.D. v. Croatia
V.D. v. Croatia HRV 08/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment by the police upon arrest in two cases and lack of effective investigations into the allegations in all cases. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10183
V.D. v. Romania
V.D. v. Romania ROU 28/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment in prison due to the failure to provide a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13083
V.F.C. v. Spain
V.F.C. v. Spain CRPD/C/21/D/34/2015 Communication number s : 034/2015 Author: V.F.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Spain Submission date 16 Oct 2015 Date of decision 02 Apr 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/21/D/34/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2515/en-US
V.M. v. Australia
V.M. v. Australia CAT/C/67/D/723/2015 Communication number s : 723/2015 Author: V.M. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Australia Submission date 30 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/723/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2626/en-US
V.W. v. Germany
V.W. v. Germany CRC/C/87/D/75/2019 Communication number s : 075/2019 Author: M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Germany Submission date 18 Jan 2019 Date of decision 31 May 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/87/D/75/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2969/en-US
VAJNAI v. Hungary
VAJNAI v. Hungary HUN 08/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to the applicants criminal convictions on the basis of a prohibition of the use of totalitarian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10507
VALDHUTER v. Romania
VALDHUTER v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the inability to question a witness whose statements had been taken into account for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47943
VAMVAKAS v. Greece
VAMVAKAS v. Greece GRC 16/01/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 17:31:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a tribunal due to the excessively formalistic rejection as inadmissible of the applicants appeals in criminal proceedings before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15774
VAMVAKAS v. Greece (n° 2)
VAMVAKAS v. Greece n 2 GRC 14/09/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the dismissal of the applicant s appeal on points of law owing to the unexplained absence of the court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15759