Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3841 - 3860 of 4019
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TRABELSI v. Belgium
TRABELSI v. Belgium BEL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Extradition / deportation protection against ill treatment: extradition in 2013 to the United States notwithstanding a risk of being sentenced for terrorist activities to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1241
TRITSIS v. Greece
TRITSIS v. Greece GRC 10/09/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Rejection by the Council of State of the applicant s joint application with two other persons on the grounds of divergent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22678
TURCZANIK v. Poland
TURCZANIK v. Poland POL 30/11/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings concerning the registration of the applicant s law firm address and violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17727
TURKEY: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
TURKEY: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/TUR/1 NULL 2019 12 12T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/TUR/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 12 December 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/TUR/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/abe06be7-69f2-4a5b-9225-5dfe99ce1525
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 Communication number s : 018/2008 Author: Karen Tayag Vertido Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Philippines Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 16 Jul 2010 Comment: The JUTBCEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1700/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/677/1996 Communication number s : 677/1996 Author: Kenneth Teesdale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 16 Mar 1995 Date of decision 01 Apr 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/677/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/953/en-US
Telitsina v. Russian Federation
Telitsina v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/80/D/888/1999 Communication number s : 888/1999 Author: Yuliya Vasilyevna Telitsina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Oct 1997 Date of decision 29 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/888/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1097/en-US
Thabti v. Tunisia
Thabti v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/187/2001 Communication number s : 187/2001 Author: Dhaou Belgacem Thabti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 01 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/187/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/166/en-US
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal CCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018 Communication number s : 3199/2018 Author: Puniram Tharu and Nira Kumari Tharuni Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Nepal Submission date 28 Mar 2018 Date of decision 14 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3080/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Austria Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Austria Transparency of Party Funding Theme II AUT 2011 12 09 2012 01 13 Directorate General I Human Rights and Rule of Law Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate Strasbourg 9 December 2011 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-3E-Final-Austria-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-3E-Final-Austria-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on Romania ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on Romania Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding ROU 2014 12 12 2015 04 14 Adoption: 12 December 2014 Public Publication: 14 April 2015 Greco RC III 2014 22E Second Compliance GRECOGreco-RC-III-2014-22E-Final-Second-RC-Romania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2014-22E-Final-Second-RC-Romania-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on the United States of America ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on the United States of America Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding USA 2016 03 18 2016 04 01 Adoption: 18 March 2016 Public Publication: 01 April 2016 GrecoRC3 2016 6 Third GRECOGrecoRC3-2016-6eng-Final-USA-2nd-RC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC3-2016-6eng-Final-USA-2nd-RC-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on Azerbaijan
Third Opinion on Azerbaijan AZE ACFC/OP/III 2012 005 2012 10 10 Strasbourg 3 September 2013 Public ACFC/OP/III 2012 005 Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Third Opinion on Azerbaijan adopted on 10 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2012)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Azerbaijan_en
Third Opinion on Bulgaria
Third Opinion on Bulgaria BGR ACFC/OP/III 2014 001 2014 02 11 Strasbourg 30 July 2014 Public ACFC/OP/III 2014 001 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Bulgaria adopted on 11 February FCNMACFC/OP/III(2014)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Bulgaria_en
Third Opinion on Ireland
Third Opinion on Ireland IRL ACFC/OP/III 2012 006 2012 10 10 Strasbourg 19 April 2013 Public ACFC/OP/III 2012 006 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Ireland adopted on 10 October 2012 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2012)006https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Ireland_en
Third Opinion on Kosovo*
Third Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS ACFC/OP/III 2013 002 2013 03 06 Strasbourg 10 September 2013 Public ACFC/OP/III 2013 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Kosovo adopted on 6 March FCNMACFC/OP/III(2013)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Kosovo_en