Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 55
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ALBERT AND LE COMPTE v. BELGIUM
CASE OF ALBERT AND LE COMPTE v. BELGIUM 7299/75 7496/76 N/A BEL 2/10/1983 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved 350 90 89 445 41 70 136 180 181 388 385 325 12 11 122 448 351 145 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0210JUD000729975 COURT PLENARY CASE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0210JUD000729975https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57422
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19178/91 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 172 174 2 175 3 289 Planning Inspectorate Executive Agency Framework Document 1992 Town and Country Planning ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57954
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA 49429/99 N/A BGR 11/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Government s request for strike out rejected Violations of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71299
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 N/A TUR 5/10/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59454
CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM 9186/80 N/A BEL 10/26/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved 445 136 180 70 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM Application no. 9186/80 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57465
CASE OF DEUMELAND v. GERMANY
CASE OF DEUMELAND v. GERMANY 9384/81 N/A DEU 5/29/1986 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 41 136 180 406 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0529JUD000938481 COURT PLENARY CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0529JUD000938481https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57468
CASE OF DOLIŃSKA-FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND
CASE OF DOLI SKA FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND 49868/19 57511/19 GREGORCZYK ABRAM S. EJCHART DUBOIS M. POL 11/8/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 a Ratione materiae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Six month period ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1108JUD004986819https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213200
CASE OF EKEBERG AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF EKEBERG AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 11106/04 11108/04 11116/04 11311/04 13276/04 NAESS S. NOR 7/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 one applicant No violation of Art. 6 1 other applicants No violation of Art. 6 1 Section 108 of the Administration ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0731JUD001110604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81994
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 5100/71 5101/71 5102/71 5354/72 5370/72 N/A NLD 6/8/1976 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 2 No violation of Art. 6 3 b No violation of Art. 6 3 c No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:0608JUD000510071https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57479
CASE OF GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9063/80 N/A GBR 11/24/1986 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 6 Just satisfaction reserved Housing Control Extension and Amendment Guernsey Law 1957 Housing Control of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1124JUD000906380https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57493
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/23/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217806
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month period former six month Inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225231
CASE OF GRZĘDA v. POLAND
CASE OF GRZ DA v. POLAND 43572/18 PIETRZAK M. M CZKA PACHOLAK M. POL 3/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD004357218https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216400
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 11423/19 LYOSHENKO O. UKR 7/22/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD001142319https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211125
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 52999/08 61779/08 HOWELLS GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Juries Act 1974 1974 Act 445 76 180 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108168
CASE OF HARABIN v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF HARABIN v. SLOVAKIA 58688/11 NOVAK B. SVK 11/20/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Disciplinary proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120JUD005868811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114666