Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6041 - 6060 of 6586
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1 from 19 May 2003 to 27 May 2003 12 March 2004 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Thailand UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1 12 March UNSPE/CN.4/2004/94/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f94%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2003/104/Add.2 from 26 May 2002 to 1 June 2002 6 December 2002 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders Guatemala E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2003/104/Add.2 6 UNSPE/CN.4/2003/104/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2003%2f104%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Staselovich v. Belarus
Staselovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/77/D/887/1999 Communication number s : 887/1999 Author: Mariya Staselovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Nov 1998 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: The Committee JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/887/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1039/en-US
Stow v. Portugal
Stow v. Portugal CCPR/C/92/D/1496/2006 Communication number s : 1496/2006 Author: Dilwyn Stow Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Portugal Submission date 04 May 2006 Date of decision 01 Apr 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1496/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1416/en-US
Stronger, more independent equality bodies needed to combat intolerance and discrimination in Europe, says Council of Europe anti-racism commission
Stronger more independent equality bodies needed to combat intolerance and discrimination in Europe says Council of Europe anti racism commission 2018 03 21 Stronger more independent equality bodies needed to combat intolerance and discrimination in ECRIREC-02rev-PR-2018-266-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=REC-02rev-PR-2018-266-ENG
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/104/D/1750/2008 Communication number s : 1750/2008 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Mar 2005 Date of decision 14 Mar 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1750/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1221/en-US
Sudalenko v. Belarus
Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/1992/2010 Communication number s : 1992/2010 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Apr 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 Comment: Right to be JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1992/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1914/en-US
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017 Communication number s : 3061/2017 Author: Jaarey Suleymanova and Gulnaz Israfilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 26 Jul 2017 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3165/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Croatia* - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Croatia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-croatia-report-office-united-nations-high
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Malawi - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/MWI/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Malawi UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/MWI/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-malawi-report-office-united-nations-high
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 14 to 18 June 2010
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT from 14 to 18 June 2010 ITA a 2011 04 14 2013 11 19 CPT/Inf 2013 CPTCPT/Inf (2013) 30 [Part 2]https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-ita-20100615-en
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
Svetik v. Belarus
Svetik v. Belarus CCPR/C/81/D/927/2000 Communication number s : 927/2000 Author: Leonid Svetik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Belarus Submission date 01 Nov 1999 Date of decision 08 Jul 2004 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/927/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1117/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
T.Ç. and M.E.Ç. v. Georgia
T. . and M.E. . v. Georgia CAT/C/70/D/861/2018 Communication number s : 861/2018 Author: T. . and M.E. . Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 70 Country Georgia Submission date 15 Feb 2018 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/70/D/861/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3424/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US