Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 821 - 840 of 7257
CASE OF DALLAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF DALLAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 38395/12 PARRY C. GBR 2/11/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nulla poena sine lege Nullum crimen sine lege 288 290 291 14 597 598 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0211JUD003839512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-160432
CASE OF DALLOS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF DALLOS v. HUNGARY 29082/95 HUN 3/1/2001 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed six months No violation of Art. 6 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 284/A 1 1 and 291 1 and 3 445 190 12 14 128 109 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0301JUD002908295 SECOND ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0301JUD002908295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59264
CASE OF DAMAYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DAMAYEV v. RUSSIA 36150/04 MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 5/29/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD003615004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110944
CASE OF DAMJANAC v. CROATIA
CASE OF DAMJANAC v. CROATIA 52943/10 N/A HRV 10/24/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD005294310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127227
CASE OF DANGAYEVA AND TARAMOVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DANGAYEVA AND TARAMOVA v. RUSSIA 1896/04 Stichting Russian Justice Initiative RUS 1/8/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Procedural aspect Violation of Article 13 2 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD000189604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90489
CASE OF DANILOV v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DANILOV v. UKRAINE 2585/06 CHERNIKOV V. KOMAROV V. UKR 3/13/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD000258506https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141625
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE 40679/98 N/A UKR 4/29/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial period No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later period Violation of Art. 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD004067998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61062
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY 5797/17 FERRERO M. CHIARETTO E. ITA 7/21/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0721JUD000579717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218424
CASE OF DARESKIZB LTD v. ARMENIA
CASE OF DARESKIZB LTD v. ARMENIA 61737/08 ATANESYAN T. ARM 9/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Freedom to impart information Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0921JUD006173708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211813
CASE OF DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA 8810/05 YABLOKOV A. RUS 5/30/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD000881005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119971
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 75947/11 MOSKALENKO K. NAPARA Ye. RUS 5/30/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 a Abuse of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD007594711https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173805
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 17674/02 39081/02 ZHERDEV G. BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 7/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701JUD001767402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99750
CASE OF DE BECKER v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE BECKER v. BELGIUM 214/56 N/A BEL 3/27/1962 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Belgian Penal Code Article 123 sexies Belgian Act on Civic Screening 30 June 1961 149 148 265 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1962:0327JUD000021456 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF DE BECKER v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1962:0327JUD000021456https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57433
CASE OF DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE 12964/87 N/A FRA 12/16/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1216JUD001296487https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57778
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 19983/92 N/A BEL 2/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224JUD001998392https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58015
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY 43395/09 CONTICCHIO D. ITA 2/23/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Violation of Article 6 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0223JUD004339509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171804
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 6/18/1971 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 4 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57606
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM ARTICLE 50 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 3/10/1972 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0310JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57607
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM 13839/88 N/A BEL 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Royal Decree no. 79 of 10 November 1967 relating to the Ordre des m decins Articles 12 and 25 para. 4 al. 2 Act of 31 March 1967 Royal Decree of 6 February 1970 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001383988https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57888