Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3881 - 3900 of 4337
NICULESCU-DELLAKEZA v. Romania
NICULESCU DELLAKEZA v. Romania ROU 26/06/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial in libel and slander proceedings as well as unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Absence of hearing of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17536
Nakrash and Qifen v. China,Sweden,Syrian Arab Republic
Nakrash and Qifen v. China Sweden Syrian Arab Republic CCPR/C/94/D/1540/2007 Communication number s : 1540/2007 Author: Mahmoud Walid Nakrash and Liu Qifen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country China Sweden Syrian Arab Republic JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1540/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1471/en-US
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/133/D/2904/2016 Communication number s : 2904/2016 2907/2016 Author: Ermek Narymbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 07 Oct 2016 Date of decision 20 Oct 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2904/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3160/en-US
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2521/2015 Communication number s : 2521/2015 Author: Ermek Narymbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2521/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3267/en-US
Nasir v. Australia
Nasir v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012 Communication number s : 2229/2012 Author: Nasir Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2012 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3091/en-US
Nasirov v. Kazakhstan
Nasirov v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/52/D/475/2011 Communication number s : 475/2011 Author: Mumin Nasirov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 26 Aug 2011 Date of decision 14 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/475/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1833/en-US
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/95/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 95 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 07 May 2018 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/95/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3444/en-US
O.H.C. and J.O.C. v. Colombia
O.H.C. and J.O.C. v. Colombia CCPR/C/43/D/287/1988 Communication number s : 287/1988 Author: O.H.C. name deleted on his own behalf and on behalf of his brother Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Colombia Submission date 18 JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/287/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/636/en-US
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OZBEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey
OZBEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/01/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unnecessary interference due to the refusal of the first instance courts and the Court of Cassation to grant the applicants time to amend the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37224
Obodzinsky v. Canada
Obodzinsky v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1124/2002 Communication number s : 1124/2002 Author: Walter Obodzinsky deceased and his daughter Anita Obodzinsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 30 Sep 2002 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1124/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1336/en-US
Oleksii Katashynskyi v. Ukraine
Oleksii Katashynskyi v. Ukraine CCPR/C/123/D/2250/2013 Communication number s : 2250/2013 Author: Oleksii Katashynskyi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Mar 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2250/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2502/en-US
Ozoda Yakubova v. Uzbekistan
Ozoda Yakubova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2577/2015 Communication number s : 2577/2015 Author: Ozoda Yakubova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 03 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2577/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2487/en-US
P.F. and M.F. v. France
P.F. and M.F. v. France CCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016 Communication number s : 2780/2016 Author: P.F. and M.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country France Submission date 14 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3292/en-US
Pérez Guartambel v. Ecuador
P rez Guartambel v. Ecuador CERD/C/100/D/61/2017 Communication number s : 61/2017 Author: Yaku P rez Guartambel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 100 Country Ecuador Submission date 10 Feb 2017 Date of decision 04 Dec 2019 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/100/D/61/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3445/en-US
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The cases concern unjustified interference with the applicants right to freedom of expression as a result of civil defamation proceedings Article 49 of the Code of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37218
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PERINCEK v. Switzerland
PERINCEK v. Switzerland CHE 15/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal conviction of a Turkish politician and doctor of law for having publicly rejected the legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5850