Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 9840
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013 Communication number s : 2316/2013 Author: Arslan Dawletow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 01 May 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3101/en-US
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/80/D/917/2000 Communication number s : 917/2000 Author: Karina Arutyunyan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Mar 2000 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Under rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/917/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1099/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: Asmae Taghzouti Ezqouihel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 22 Feb 2021 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/69/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2922/en-US
B.A.C. v. Greece
B.A.C. v. Greece GRC 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 15:59:50 Case Description: The case concerned the failure by the Greek authorities to decide on an asylum application lodged by the applicant for more than twelve years. The Court held that the above EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46537
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/273/1988 Communication number s : 273/1988 Author: B.d.B. G.B. C.J.K. L.P.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Jan 1988 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/273/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/427/en-US
BACKOVIC v. Serbia
BACKOVIC v. Serbia SRB 07/05/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:00:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to impossibility to seek judicial review of the administrative authorities refusal to register an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8925
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116