Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9201 - 9220 of 9840
Ozoda Yakubova v. Uzbekistan
Ozoda Yakubova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2577/2015 Communication number s : 2577/2015 Author: Ozoda Yakubova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 03 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2577/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2487/en-US
P.A. v. Netherlands
P.A. v. Netherlands CAT/C/57/D/611/2014 Communication number s : 611/2014 Author: P.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Jun 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/611/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2117/en-US
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
P.F. and M.F. v. France
P.F. and M.F. v. France CCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016 Communication number s : 2780/2016 Author: P.F. and M.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country France Submission date 14 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2780/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3292/en-US
P.J.N. v. Netherlands
P.J.N. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/49/D/510/1992 Communication number s : 510/1992 Author: P.J.N. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Netherlands Submission date 28 Apr 1992 Date of decision 19 Oct 1993 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/510/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/401/en-US
P.N. et al. v. Finland
P.N. et al. v. Finland CRC/C/91/D/100/2019 Communication number s : 100/2019 Author: P.N. K.K. and O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Finland Submission date 30 Sep 2019 Date of decision 12 Sep 2022 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCRC/C/91/D/100/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3440/en-US
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US
Pérez Guartambel v. Ecuador
P rez Guartambel v. Ecuador CERD/C/100/D/61/2017 Communication number s : 61/2017 Author: Yaku P rez Guartambel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 100 Country Ecuador Submission date 10 Feb 2017 Date of decision 04 Dec 2019 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/100/D/61/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3445/en-US
PAIXAO MOREIRA SA FERNANDES v. Portugal
PAIXAO MOREIRA SA FERNANDES v. Portugal PRT 28/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the court of appeal which had convicted the applicant for the first time at second instance had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55361
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey
PAKDEMIRLI v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The cases concern unjustified interference with the applicants right to freedom of expression as a result of civil defamation proceedings Article 49 of the Code of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37218
PAKOZDI v. Hungary
PAKOZDI v. Hungary HUN 23/03/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before the Supreme Court when revising the court of appeal s decision and endorsing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10517
PALUDA v. Slovakia
PALUDA v. Slovakia SVK 23/08/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in disciplinary due to a judge s inability to obtain judicial review of his suspension from office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47683
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PAPACHELAS v. Greece
PAPACHELAS v. Greece GRC 25/03/1999 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:33:21 Case Description: Protection of property: Impossibility for the applicants to obtain a compensation for the expropriation of their land because of an irrebuttable statutory presumption EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21602
PARDO CAMPOY AND LOZANO RODRIGUEZ v. Spain
PARDO CAMPOY AND LOZANO RODRIGUEZ v. Spain ESP 14/01/2020 00:00:00 17/01/2020 18:25:44 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before the court of appeal which examined on appeal both EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54585
PASQUINI v. San Marino (no. 2)
PASQUINI v. San Marino no. 2 SMR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence. Even though the criminal proceedings against the applicant on charges of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57159
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 22/11/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The case of Patrikova concerns three different violations of Art. 1 of Prot. 1 due to : 1. the unlawful and arbitrary seizure and damage to the applicant s merchandise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3819
PENCHEVI v. Bulgaria
PENCHEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 10/05/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the infringement of the applicants right to respect of their family life as the court proceedings concerning the request to allow the second applicant to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3927
PERINCEK v. Switzerland
PERINCEK v. Switzerland CHE 15/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal conviction of a Turkish politician and doctor of law for having publicly rejected the legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5850
PETAR MATAS v. Croatia
PETAR MATAS v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate restrictions imposed by the authorities on the use of a commercial building pending the assessment whether it has any cultural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45981