Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9621 - 9640 of 9840
Sviridov v. Kazakhstan
Sviridov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/120/D/2158/2012 Communication number s : 2158/2012 Author: Andrei Sviridov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2158/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2305/en-US
T.J. v. Lithuania
T.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009 Communication number s : 1911/2009 Author: T.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1329/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003 Communication number s : 1206/2003 Author: T. M. and Z. I Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 13 Oct 2003 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1551/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.T. v. Ukraine
T.T. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017 Communication number s : 2985/2017 Author: T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Apr 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2985/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3686/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
TABOR v. Poland
TABOR v. Poland POL 27/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to the Supreme Court on the ground of the absence of reasons for the dismissal of requests for legal aid and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18245
TARARIYEVA v. Russia
TARARIYEVA v. Russia RUS 14/03/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Authorities failure to protect the right to life of the applicant s son due to the lack of adequate medical care in prison and defective medical assistance at a public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13715
TARVERDIYEV v. Azerbaijan
TARVERDIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 26/10/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These cases concern the non enforcement of final domestic court decisions violations of Article 6 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 entailing three different kinds EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1757
TARVYDAS v. Lithuania
TARVYDAS v. Lithuania LTU 23/02/2022 00:00:00 14/03/2022 11:34:31 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the domestic courts to address arguments raised by applicant in decisions of 2018 ordering him to restore an unlawfully demolished house EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59855
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / Protection of private life: Failure to protect the applicants from private activities producing a dangerous effects EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37302
TEK GIDA IS SENDIKASI v. Turkey
TEK GIDA IS SENDIKASI v. Turkey TUR 04/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to form and join trade unions on account of the dismissal in 2004 of forty employees working in three factories of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47507
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TETE v. France
TETE v. France FRA 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for malicious falsehoods on account of an open letter which he had written to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55749
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland FIN 15/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings as the applicant company was not allowed by Supreme Administrative Court to submit comments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4814
TOGO : VISIT REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE
TOGO : VISIT REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE CAT/OP/TGO/1 NULL 2017 04 28T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/TGO/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 28 April 2016 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: French English French UHRICAT/OP/TGO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8d0d2835-dcfd-4fd9-b681-7996939fdc69