Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 885
A.A.S. v. Denmark
A.A.S. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2464/2014 Communication number s : 2464/2014 Author: A.A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Oct 2014 Date of decision 04 Jul 2016 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2464/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2224/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.H. v. Denmark
A.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014 Communication number s : 2370/2014 Author: A.H. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Mar 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1954/en-US
A.N. v. Switzerland
A.N. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/742/2016 Communication number s : 742/2016 Author: A.N. represented by counsel Centre Suisse pour la D fense des Droits des Migrants Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2447/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania ROU 12/07/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings which ended with the applicant s conviction to a suspended prison sentence for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16525
AL AKIDI v. Bulgaria
AL AKIDI v. Bulgaria BGR 31/10/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length and unlawfulness of detention on remand and lack of its judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14261
ALBERTI v. Italy
ALBERTI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of the applicants by law enforcement agents in the context of their arrest and ineffectiveness the ensuing criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28300
ALBINA v. Romania
ALBINA v. Romania ROU 28/07/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings for recovery of property nationalised during the communist regime as the court of last instance failed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16125
ALEXE v. Romania
ALEXE v. Romania ROU 03/08/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of an adversarial trial in civil proceedings due to the fact that the last instance court based its decision on a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12728
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANGEL ANGELOV v. Bulgaria
ANGEL ANGELOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/05/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unmotivated dismissal of the applicant s petition for review cassation by the Supreme Court of Cassation. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14655
ANTUNES AND PIRES v. Portugal
ANTUNES AND PIRES v. Portugal PRT 21/09/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to communicate to the applicants several documents presented by the public prosecutor and/or the memoranda EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9917
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia RUS 29/06/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty through quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27544
ASIMIONESE v. the Republic of Moldova
ASIMIONESE v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 07/01/2020 00:00:00 17/01/2020 18:25:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the Chisinau Court of Appeal in December 2011 to hear the victims EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54573
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 28/10/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against detention lack of a remedy: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14265
ATUTXA MENDIOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ATUTXA MENDIOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 13/09/2017 00:00:00 27/09/2017 10:04:06 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicants conviction by the Supreme Court departing from the trial judgment which had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47733