Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2221 - 2238 of 2238
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/53/24/Add.1 from 31 October 2022 to 11 November 2022 21 April 2023 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Liberia United Nations A/HRC/53/24/Add.1 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/53/24/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f53%2f24%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.4 from 9 July 2007 to 13 July 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chile UNITED NATIONS A UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014 Communication number s : 2366/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 19 Mar 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2366/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2017/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014 Communication number s : 2410/2014 Author: Yury Orkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2781/en-US
Z v. Denmark v. Denmark
Z v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2422/2014 Communication number s : 2422/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2014 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2422/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2096/en-US
Z. v. Switzerland
Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/738/2016 Communication number s : 738/2016 Author: Z. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 23 Mar 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: Decision of JUTBCAT/C/64/D/738/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2465/en-US
c("Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )", "Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )")
c Document/information Follow up Information c A/HRC/36/61 A/HRC/36/61 c c 27 July 2017 27 July 2017 c Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia Cambodia third official country visit Special Rapporteur on the situation of human UNSPc("A/HRC/36/61", "A/HRC/36/61")https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f61&Lang=en
de León Castro v. Spain
de Le n Castro v. Spain CCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005 Communication number s : 1388/2005 Author: Jos Luis de Le n Castro Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Spain Submission date 23 Aug 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar 2009 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1388/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1016/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Denmark,France,Paraguay,Switzerland
v. Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland CRC/C/92/2 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 83/2019 31/201774/2019 .30/2017 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 92 Country Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland Submission date Date JUTBCRC/C/92/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3755/en-US