Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 4417
ARSOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ARSOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 15/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the expropriation of the applicants plot of land without adequate reasoning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6508
ARTASHES ANTONYAN v. Armenia
ARTASHES ANTONYAN v. Armenia ARM 22/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference due to the administrative fine imposed for breaching customs regulations without domestic courts comprehensive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56865
ASDAC v. the Republic of Moldova
ASDAC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/03/2021 00:00:00 24/03/2021 16:28:16 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the National Bank of Moldova s use on new coins of artworks created by two members of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57043
ASSYMOMITIS v. Greece
ASSYMOMITIS v. Greece GRC 14/01/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities failure to provide clear and reliable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22254
ATATUR AND PAMIR v. Turkey
ATATUR AND PAMIR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26772
AVDIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
AVDIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 07/02/2019 00:00:00 14/02/2019 15:02:13 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unfair trial due to the non enforcement of final domestic judgments ordering to pay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51417
AYANGIL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AYANGIL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/03/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of property: Unjustified interference on account of de facto expropriation of the applicants property by administrative authorities under the Law on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37230
AZALIYA, TOV v. Ukraine
AZALIYA TOV v. Ukraine UKR 09/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: Interference with the applicant companies peaceful enjoyment of its possessions devoid of any legal basis and incompatible with the principle of the rule of law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62845
Abdelkader Boudjema v. Algeria
Abdelkader Boudjema v. Algeria CCPR/C/121/D/2283/2013 Communication number s : 2283/2013 Author: Abdelkader Boudjema Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Algeria Submission date 18 Jun 2013 Date of decision 30 Oct 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2283/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2350/en-US
Abdurakhmanov v. Uzbekistan
Abdurakhmanov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/125/D/2295/2013 Communication number s : 2295/2013 Author: Davron Abdurakhmanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2295/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3097/en-US
Aboufaied v. Libya
Aboufaied v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008 Communication number s : 1782/2008 Author: Tahar Mohamed Aboufaied Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 05 Apr 2008 Date of decision 21 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1364/en-US
Abramova v. Belarus
Abramova v. Belarus CEDAW/C/49/D/23/2009 Communication number s : 023/2009 Author: Inga Abramova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Belarus Submission date 03 Apr 2009 Date of decision 25 Jul 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/23/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1703/en-US
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research (CETS No. 195)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Biomedical Research CETS No. 195 195 Strasbourg 2005 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 164 Strasbourg 2007 09 01T00:00:00 5 COECETS No. 195https://rm.coe.int/168008371a
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012 Communication number s : 2175/2012 Author: Adelaida Kim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Feb 2009 Date of decision 04 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2483/en-US
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Aduhene and Agyeman v. Germany
Aduhene and Agyeman v. Germany CCPR/C/93/D/1543/2007 Communication number s : 1543/2007 Author: Claudia Aduhene and Daniel Agyeman Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Germany Submission date 14 Dec 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1543/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1438/en-US
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014 Communication number s : 2483/2014 Author: Vladimir Adyrkhayev Behruz Solikhov and the Religious Association of Jehovah s Witnesses in Dushanb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3555/en-US
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (ETS No. 156)
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ETS No. 156 156 Strasbourg 1995 01 31T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member COEETS No. 156https://rm.coe.int/168007cdab
Aheyeu v. Belarus
Aheyeu v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2862/2016 Communication number s : 2862/2016 Author: Aleh Aheyeu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Aug 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2862/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3188/en-US