Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 3323
BURUNDI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BURUNDI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BDI/CO/2NEW NULL 2014 12 11T00:00:00 CAT Concluding observations on the second periodic report of Burundi 1.The Committee against Torture considered the second periodic report of Burundi CAT/C/BDI/2 at its 1262nd and UHRICAT/C/BDI/CO/2NEWhttps://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/38e36b2e-f609-40eb-856f-4d110ccf235b
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Baranovs v. Latvia
Baranovs v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017 Communication number s : 3021/2017 Author: Ivans Baranovs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3167/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Bekmanov and Egemberdiev v. Kyrgyzstan
Bekmanov and Egemberdiev v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/125/D/2312/2013 Communication number s : 2312/2013 Author: Alymbek Bekmanov and Damirbek Egemberdiev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 26 Mar 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2312/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3100/en-US
Bekzhan et al. v. Kazakhstan
Bekzhan et al. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2661/2015 Communication number s : 2661/2015 Author: Polat Bekzhan Leon Weaver Jr. and Helmut Echtle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 27 Mar 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3283/en-US
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain E/C.12/61/D/5/2015 Communication number s : 005/2015 Author: Mohamed Ben Djazia and Naouel Bellili Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Spain Submission date 20 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Jun 2017 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/61/D/5/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2407/en-US
Benhadj v. Algeria
Benhadj v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1173/2003 Communication number s : 1173/2003 Author: Abdelhamid Benhadj Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 31 Mar 2003 Date of decision 20 Jul 2007 Comment: Two Committee JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1173/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1363/en-US
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
Bondar v. Uzbekistan
Bondar v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/101/D/1769/2008 Communication number s : 1769/2008 Author: Natalya Bondar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Jan 2008 Date of decision 25 Mar 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1769/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1612/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CALIN v. Romania
CALIN v. Romania ROU 19/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to inability of the applicants who were born out of wedlock to bring paternity actions on the grounds that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39529
CANGI v. Turkey
CANGI v. Turkey TUR 29/04/2019 00:00:00 20/06/2019 13:33:03 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of freedom of expression on account of the authorities refusal to provide the applicant a member and representative of an NGO with an official EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52270
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND 25133/20 31856/20 SGEIRSSON J. J NSD TTIR .I. ISL 11/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002513320https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220885
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A, B AND C v. LATVIA
CASE OF A B AND C v. LATVIA 30808/11 MOLA I. LVA 3/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003080811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161741
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA 56987/15 THREEFOLD LEGAL ADVISORS LLC RUS 10/2/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186439