Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6381 - 6400 of 6455
VISIT TO UZBEKISTAN - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS
VISIT TO UZBEKISTAN REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS A/HRC/44/47/ADD.1 NULL 2020 04 20T00:00:00 SR Independence of judges United Nations A/HRC/44/47/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 April 2020 Original: UHRIA/HRC/44/47/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/08c34eb5-b125-4a78-b87a-52cd3ee6e682
VUKOTA-BOJIC v. Switzerland
VUKOTA BOJIC v. Switzerland CHE 18/01/2017 00:00:00 13/04/2017 16:28:22 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to secret surveillance of a social insurance claimant by private investigators without sufficient legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46669
Vakoumé et al. v. France
Vakoum et al. v. France CCPR/C/70/D/822/1998 Communication number s : 822/1998 Author: Mathieu Vakoum and 28 other persons Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country France Submission date 11 Mar 1998 Date of decision 31 Oct 2000 JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/822/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/910/en-US
Van Hulst v. Netherlands
Van Hulst v. Netherlands CCPR/C/82/D/903/2000 Communication number s : 903/2000 Author: Antonius Cornelis Van Hulst Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Apr 1998 Date of decision 01 Nov 2004 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/903/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1146/en-US
Vasily Poliakov v. Belarus
Vasily Poliakov v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/2030/2011 Communication number s : 2030/2011 Author: Vasily Poliakov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Jan 2010 Date of decision 17 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2030/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1862/en-US
Velichkin v. Belarus
Velichkin v. Belarus CCPR/C/85/D/1022/2001 Communication number s : 1022/2001 Author: Vladimir Velichkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Belarus Submission date 09 May 2001 Date of decision 20 Oct 2005 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1022/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/988/en-US
Viktor Leven v. Kazakhstan
Viktor Leven v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/112/D/2131/2012 Communication number s : 2131/2012 Author: Viktor Leven represented by counsel Anastasia Miller Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2131/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1933/en-US
Viktor Sazonov v. Belarus
Viktor Sazonov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2397/2014 Communication number s : 2397/2014 Author: Viktor Sazonov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Feb 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2397/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3179/en-US
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010 Communication number s : 1952/2010 Author: Vitaly Symonik represented by counsel Roman Kisliak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Dec 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1887/en-US
Vojnovic v. Croatia
Vojnovic v. Croatia CCPR/C/95/D/1510/2006 Communication number s : 1510/2006 Author: Dusan Vojnovic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Croatia Submission date 23 Jan 2006 Date of decision 30 Mar 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1510/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1488/en-US
W.B.E. v. Netherlands
W.B.E. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/46/D/432/1990 Communication number s : 432/1990 Author: W.B.E. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jul 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/432/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/473/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
Waldman v. Canada
Waldman v. Canada CCPR/C/67/D/694/1996 Communication number s : 694/1996 Author: Arieh Hollis Waldman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 1996 Date of decision 03 Nov 1999 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/694/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/839/en-US
Wallmann et al. v. Austria
Wallmann et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001 Communication number s : 1002/2001 Author: Franz Wallmann Rusella Wallmann Hotel zum Hirschen Josef Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Austria Submission date 02 Feb 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1101/en-US
Warsame v. Canada
Warsame v. Canada CCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010 Communication number s : 1959/2010 Author: Jama Warsame Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 102 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2011 Comment: On 27 July 2010 the JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1639/en-US
Weerawansa v. Sri Lanka
Weerawansa v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/95/D/1406/2005 Communication number s : 1406/2005 Author: Anura Weerawansa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 10 Mar 2005 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1406/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1512/en-US
Weismann Lanza and Lanza Perdomo v. Uruguay
Weismann Lanza and Lanza Perdomo v. Uruguay CCPR/C/9/D/8/1977 Communication number s : 008/1977 Author: Ana Maria Garcia Lanza de Netto on behalf of her aunt and uncle who later joined as submitting parties Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No JUTBCCPR/C/9/D/8/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/385/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Winkler v. Austria
Winkler v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1468/2006 Communication number s : 1468/2006 Author: Hermann Winkler Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1468/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1382/en-US