Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 5225
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.M. v. Turkey
A.M. v. Turkey TUR 19/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to the imposition of disciplinary sanctions by the Disciplinary Committee of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58707
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
A.P., GARCON AND NICOT v. France
A.P. GARCON AND NICOT v. France FRA 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the second and third applicants due to refusal of transgender persons requests to have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47539
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia LVA 12/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering a publishing company to pay compensation for damages for the publication in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31136
A.S. v. Turkey
A.S. v. Turkey TUR 28/03/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation awarded for expropriation and substantial difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28569
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28793
A.T. v. Estonia
A.T. v. Estonia EST 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Interference due to dismissal without examination of the detained applicant s complaints concerning the circumstances of his visit to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51535
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
A.V. v. Slovenia
A.V. v. Slovenia SVN 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 16:37:20 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference and failure of authorities to protect the applicant s right to contact with his three children due to the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52625
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
ABBAS v. France
ABBAS v. France FRA 20/10/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to a three year exclusion order concerning an Algerian national. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32062
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and protection against ill treatment: Disproportionate interference due to the prosecution of participants in peaceful assemblies and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50395
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ACAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ACAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 10/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays in the payment of additional compensation for expropriations and the application of an insufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30226
ACAR v. Turkey
ACAR v. Turkey TUR 10/01/2007 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays in payment of additional compensation for expropriation and the insufficient rate of default interest EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26852
ACAR v. Turkey
ACAR v. Turkey TUR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by domestic courts for the expropriation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30122