Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5181 - 5200 of 5225
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Impossibility for the applicants to apply for compensation for a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14465
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 NULL 2023 03 13T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 23 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/YEM/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7107bb20-0509-4a23-bfe4-02e5a99e8e2b
YESILGOZ v. Turkey
YESILGOZ v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to criminal convictions of members of the executive committee of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5540
YETIS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YETIS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of failure to pay the difference between the value of the compensation for the expropriation on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37288
YILDIRIR v. Turkey
YILDIRIR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on the ground of the authorities ordering demolition without compensation of the applicant s house purchased in good EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37152
YILDIZ v. Austria
YILDIZ v. Austria AUT 31/01/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to residence prohibitions imposed under the 1992 and 1997 Aliens Act and the applicants expulsion EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-897
YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. Turkey
YILTAS YILDIZ TURISTIK TESISLERI A.S. v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the unreasonably low amount of compensation compared to the value of the property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5494
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/07/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 18:23:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities refusal to provide compensation in the form of company shares for property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50293
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 16/10/2018 15:10:36 Case Description: This group of cases concerns interferences with the applicants right to respect for their home or their private and family life as a result of eviction or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1924
YORDANOVA & TOSHEV v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA TOSHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 02/01/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to conviction of a journalist and a chief editor of a newspaper to payment of damages in civil proceedings for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3871
YORDANOVI v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of association due to their prosecution for setting up a political party Muslim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56493
YUKSELLER LTD. STI. v. Turkey
YUKSELLER LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 19/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s de facto expropriation without adequate compensation and domestic courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56857
YURIY VOLKOV v. Ukraine
YURIY VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 19/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference on account of the taking of a blood sample by an investigator and not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31850
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria BGR 02/10/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in respect of the first applicant as in the restitution proceedings for recovery of property acquired EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3847
YUSUF CELEBI v. Turkey (no. 2)
YUSUF CELEBI v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 18/12/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26634
Yklymova v. Turkmenistan
Yklymova v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/96/D/1460/2006 Communication number s : 1460/2006 Author: Maral Yklymova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 27 Jul 2005 Date of decision 20 Jul 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1460/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1522/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.H. v. Australia
Z.H. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010 Communication number s : 1957/2010 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 14 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1652/en-US
Z.H. v. Denmark
Z.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2602/2015 Communication number s : 2602/2015 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Feb 2015 Date of decision 27 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2602/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2291/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US